Alien Worlds TLM
Alien Worlds leads in team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding a C- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
C-43.28 / 100
Sector Rank #125 · Global Rank #384
Overall Rating
C- · 43.28 / 100Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
81.8
Market Ecosystem
70.67
Security & Compliance
54.61
Overall Score
43.28
Alien Worlds overall rating C-s C (total 43.27), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and security compliance across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Alien Worlds has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and security compliance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and milestone delivery data.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery records.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
66.75/100Consensus Mechanism?The project runs on a mature public blockchain, inheriting its consensus mechanism.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Main network years of operation?The main network of the project has been operating stably for many years, accumulating operational experience.Weight 15%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information on recent upgrades makes it impossible to assess quality.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?The project runs on multiple public chains, and client diversity depends on the underlying chain.Weight 20%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Tokenomics
18/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of a clear deflationary mechanism, and the ability to capture value is extremely weak.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a large amount of uncirculated supply with no lock in positions, and inflationary pressures are extremely high.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The staking or lock-up rate is extremely low, and market liquidity risks are high.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to long-term value stability.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Team Governance
81/100Core Development Team?Core team members have good backgrounds but lack experience in serial entrepreneurship.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Governance mechanisms?It adopts a DAO governance model, with high community participation and strong governance.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Financial Transparency?High transparency of funds, with investments from well-known institutions.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Concentration of key people?Governance mechanisms are relatively decentralized, with low concentration of key figures.Weight 20%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Market Ecosystem
50.5/100Active Address?High daily active addresses mean active user engagement.Weight 30%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains and has a strong platform score.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
DeFi TVL?DeFi has extremely low total locked value, and the depth of ecosystem finance is insufficient.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Developer community?There is a lack of public developer activity data, and the GitHub repository is empty.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
44.25/100Historical Major Failure?There are no major safety incident records in history, and the project operates stably.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of regulatory compliance data, resulting in extremely low compliance scores.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Sec Attitude?The lack of SEC regulatory compliance data creates uncertainty.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Security Score: Audit coverage is good, but permission concentration needs improvement.Weight 15%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
C- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Alien WorldsC- · 43.28 |  DODOC- · 46.61 |  BasenjiC- · 46.54 |  OKZOOC- · 46.47 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 43.28 | 46.61 | 46.54 | 46.47 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 0 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 66.79 | 24.53 | 1.07 |
| Team Governance | 81.8 | 90.37 | 51.6 | 56.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 70.67 | 91.6 | 55.01 | 67.44 |
| Security & Compliance | 54.61 | 0 | 60.45 | 60.5 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.