Ampleforth Governance FORTH

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public delivery data and low development activity.Weight 35%to be on the low side · 40 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?GitHub activity is inactive, and upgrade records are relatively low.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 25 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of clear historical delay records.Weight 15%No clear records · 70 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Relies on Ethereum's PoS mechanism, offering high security.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating operational experience.Weight 15%About 5 years · 80 / 100

Recent upgrades?GitHub activity is inactive, with no recent update records.Weight 35%No recent upgrades · 10 / 100

Client Diversity?Relying on the Ethereum ecosystem, it has good client diversity.Weight 20%Good (depends on Ethereum) · 85 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?The FORTH token does not have a clear deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?There is uncirculated supply, but no clear inflation data.Weight 25%There is potential release · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of public staking or lock-up data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a supply ceiling, but weak value capture capability.Weight 20%15,297,897 FORTH · 54.25 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team is relatively small in size and has low development activity.Weight 30%Small team size · 20 / 100

Governance mechanisms?There is an active DAO governance mechanism with high community participation.Weight 25%DAO Governance (Active) · 70 / 100

Financial Transparency?Funding sources are transparent, supported by well-known investment institutions.Weight 25%Good · 65 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contract ownership is concentrated, posing a single point of risk.Weight 20%Relatively high · 20 / 100

Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%Good · 75 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream chains, with good ecosystem scalability.Weight 25%3. Chains · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for projects themselves, making assessment difficult.Weight 25%Insufficient data (project's own TVL) · 30 / 100

Developer community?GitHub activity is inactive, and developer community engagement is low.Weight 20%Low activity · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%No public record · 80 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies is complex and full of uncertainty.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 40 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's approach toward crypto assets is relatively cautious, with uncertainty.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 40 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100