AINFT NFT

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and on-time data delivery.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, AI platforms have launched, but overall development activity is low.Weight 30%There was a major platform launch · 10 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a token, its security depends on the underlying public chain consensus mechanism.Weight 30%Rely on the underlying public chain (PoS/DPoS) · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?Since the project went online in 2021, the mainnet has been running for a long time.Weight 15%About 5 years · 80 / 100

Recent upgrades?Recently, an AI service platform has launched, but lacks quality details.Weight 35%AINFT AI platform launched · 60 / 100

Client Diversity?As tokens, client diversity depends on the underlying public chain.Weight 20%Relying on the underlying public blockchain · 60 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of a clear deflation mechanism, and the strength of demand logic is low.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?The circulating supply has reached the total supply, with a cap and potential inflation.Weight 25%Potential inflation present · 10 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of public staking or lock-up data, or the proportion is extremely low.Weight 25%Insufficient/very low data · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply, which helps stabilize its long-term value.Weight 20%Capped (9.99 trillion) · 80 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and experience in finance and management.Weight 30%The core team is highly experienced · 60 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Project governance mechanisms are relatively centralized and transparency is average.Weight 25%Centralized Governance · 40 / 100

Financial Transparency?Transparency of funds is average, with room for improvement.Weight 25%Average · 59 / 100

Concentration of key people?Project governance is centralized, with a high concentration of key personnel.Weight 20%Slightly high · 30 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is average.Weight 30%Average · 42.15 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on multiple mainstream public chains, with average cross-chain liquidity.Weight 25%3. Chains · 60 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for projects themselves.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Developer community?Lack of active developer communities and codebase activity.Weight 20%Inactive · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract contains minting rights, posing significant security risks.Weight 25%There is a risk of coinage rights · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Lack of clear stance from the SEC regarding the nature of its tokens.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?The contract has minting rights, which may lead to unlimited issuance.Weight 15%There is a risk of coinage rights · 0 / 100