Arweave AR

Smart Contract PlatformInfrastructureDePINStorage Network

Arweave leads with its economic model and market ecosystem performance, with technical implementation remaining the main focus and currently holding an B+ rating.

Rating updated 2026-07-28
B+75.96 / 100

Sector Rank #39 · Global Rank #47

Roadmap Delivery71.8C-
Technical Implementation68.05D+
Tokenomics82.8B-
Team Governance77.29C+
Market Ecosystem78.53C+
Security & Compliance75.4C
01

Overall Rating

B+ · 75.96 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
71.8
Technical Implementation
68.05
Tokenomics
82.8
Team Governance
77.29
Market Ecosystem
78.53
Security & Compliance
75.4
Overall Score
75.96

Arweave overall rating B+ (total score 75.96), ranking high in economic model, market ecosystem, and team governance across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is technical implementation (68.05 points)—a dimension lower than other dimensions in the six-dimensional score.

Rating Team Conclusion: "Arweave has relative advantages in economic model, market ecosystem, and team governance, but its current shortcomings are mainly in technical implementation." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

71/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public, detailed roadmap delivery dataWeight 35%Insufficient data · 70 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery detailsWeight 30%Insufficient data · 70 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available pending delivery milestone informationWeight 20%Insufficient data · 75 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical delaysWeight 15%Insufficient data · 70 / 100

Technical Implementation

68.5/100

Consensus Mechanism?The innovative storage consensus mechanism has been stably operationalWeight 30%PoA (Proof of Access) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been online since early 2020 and has been running for a long timeWeight 15%About 6 years · 80 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed quality assessments of recent upgradesWeight 35%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversityWeight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Tokenomics

82.5/100

Deflationary Mechanism?The supply cap is clear, but there is no burning mechanismWeight 30%Fixed supply, no clear deflation · 75 / 100

Inflation rate?Circulating supply is close to maximum supply, and inflation rates are extremely lowWeight 25%Very Low (Nearly Fixed) · 90 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The Arweave mechanism is not traditional PoS, with no direct staking rateWeight 25%Insufficient data · 70 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?A clear fixed supply capWeight 20%66,000,000 AR · 100 / 100

Team Governance

79.5/100

Core Development Team?Founders and core members have transparent and open informationWeight 30%The core team is stable and transparent · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Lack of clear details on decentralized governance mechanismsWeight 25%Led by the core team · 70 / 100

Financial Transparency?Multiple rounds of financing information and well-known investment institutions have been disclosedWeight 25%Financing information is disclosed · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?Founder Sam Williams has significant influenceWeight 20%Founder-led · 70 / 100

Market Ecosystem

70.75/100

Active Address?Lack of publicly available active address dataWeight 30%Insufficient data · 70 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As a storage layer, the ecosystem is application-oriented, not L1/L2 countWeight 25%Focused on storage, not multi-chain · 75 / 100

DeFi TVL?Arweave is primarily for storage, not a DeFi protocolWeight 25%Non-DeFi platforms · 60 / 100

Developer community?GitHub has a repository, project data, and a considerable number of followersWeight 20%Community activity is moderate · 80 / 100

Security & Compliance

73.5/100

Historical Major Failure?So far, there have been no major public security incidentsWeight 25%No major public faults have been disclosed so far · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Decentralized storage protocols face regulatory uncertaintyWeight 30%Somewhat cautious · 70 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on crypto assets is generally strict and uncertainWeight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 65 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of publicly available data on client bug frequencyWeight 15%Insufficient data · 70 / 100

04

B+ Peer Comparison

Export CSV
ArweaveB+ · 75.96Nervos NetworkB+ · 79.75THORChainB+ · 79.75dYdXB+ · 79.54
Overall Score75.9679.7579.7579.54
Roadmap Delivery71.880.3475.4675.72
Technical Implementation68.0574.4568.5569.95
Tokenomics82.880.480.180.1
Team Governance77.2981.6985.8785.67
Market Ecosystem78.5376.7480.4880.34
Security & Compliance75.483.7785.0383.41

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions