Bounce AUCTION

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public delivery data and sluggish development activity trends.Weight 35%Insufficient data and sluggish development activity · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade information and sluggish development activity trends.Weight 30%Insufficient data and sluggish development activity · 30 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There are a few public events, but a lack of clear pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%There are a few public incidents · 50 / 100

History Extension Record?There is no historical record of delays, but no clear negative information.Weight 15%Insufficient data and sluggish development activity · 40 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on a mature Ethereum PoS mechanism, it offers high security.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a long operating time and has been market-validated.Weight 15%About 5.1 years · 85 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of recent upgrade quality data, making it impossible to assess their impact.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?As an Ethereum ecosystem project, it benefits from the diversity of Ethereum clients.Weight 20%Good (depends on Ethereum) · 80 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit deflationary mechanism has been found in the tokenomics model.Weight 30%No explicit deflation mechanism · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?The contract has additional issuance rights and carries potential inflation risks.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 5 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Staking or lock-up rates are extremely low, providing insufficient support for token demand.Weight 25%Very Low · 5 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a theoretical supply cap, but contracts can be issued additionally, so the reliability of the cap is low.Weight 20%10,000,000 AUCTION (Additional issuance possible) · 20 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and are backed by well-known VCs.Weight 30%The core team has a strong background · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are sound, and community participation is high.Weight 25%Decentralized Governance (Good) · 88 / 100

Financial Transparency?High transparency in fund usage, and the community can monitor it.Weight 25%Good · 88 / 100

Concentration of key people?The concentration of critical permissions is moderately low and carries certain risks.Weight 20%Moderately low · 65 / 100

Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%Activity level is good · 86 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream blockchains, with extensive ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%Multi-chain deployment (extensive) · 90 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi's total locked amount is extremely low, weak in capturing ecosystem value.Weight 25%Very Low · 5 / 100

Developer community?Developer communities are low in activity, and code contributions are inactive.Weight 20%Low activity · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract has the authority to issue additional rights, posing a significant security risk.Weight 25%Permission to issue additional rights exists · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Having additional issuance rights may lead regulators to identify them as securities, and the regulatory attitude is unfriendly.Weight 30%Unfriendly (has permission to post additional posts) · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Having rights to issue additional shares may lead the SEC to classify them as securities, but the SEC's attitude is unfriendly.Weight 30%Unfriendly (has permission to post additional posts) · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?The contract has additional issuance rights, constituting a serious security vulnerability.Weight 15%Permission to issue additional rights exists · 0 / 100