Auto AUTO

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of specific roadmap delivery data and model-based inferences.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 65 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of specific information about recent upgrades.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Specific pending delivery milestones have not been disclosed.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records.Weight 15%No public record · 65 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Relying on the underlying chain's consensus mechanism, PoSA carries centralization risks.Weight 30%PoSA (BSC) / PoS (Polygon) · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The project has been online since early 2021 and has been running for a long time.Weight 15%About 5 years · 65 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of specific information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 55 / 100

Client Diversity?As an application-layer project, client diversity does not directly apply.Weight 20%Not applicable (application layer) · 55 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%No clear mechanism · 55 / 100

Inflation rate?The lack of circulating supply data makes it impossible to accurately assess the inflation rate.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of direct data on staking or lock-up rates.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply, which helps stabilize its value.Weight 20%80,638 AUTO · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team information is limited, with only one builder listed.Weight 30%Sayo (Builder) · 78 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Safety Score: A high governance intensity score indicates a sound governance mechanism.Weight 25%Presence (Safety Score, High Score) · 85 / 100

Financial Transparency?There is a financing record, but transparency information on fund usage is limited.Weight 25%Financing track record, moderate transparency · 75 / 100

Concentration of key people?Core team information is concentrated, posing a single point of risk.Weight 20%Slightly high · 65 / 100

Active Address?Lack of specific data on active addresses.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 65 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed across multiple mainstream chains, with broad ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%Multi-chain (BSC, Polygon, HECO) · 80 / 100

DeFi TVL?The total value locked is relatively low, and its market appeal is limited.Weight 25%Approximately $5.43 million · 60 / 100

Developer community?Data missing on GitHub, questionable developer community activity.Weight 20%Low activity · 55 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There is a lack of public records of major safety incidents, and the safety score is good.Weight 25%No public record · 85 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Regulation in the DeFi sector is tightening, and projects face a cautious approach.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 70 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC takes a cautious stance on most crypto assets, leading to disputes over securities identification.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 65 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of specific bug frequency, but the security score is high.Weight 15%Insufficient data / high code quality · 90 / 100