Banana BANANA

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As an ERC-20 token, it relies on Ethereum's mature PoS consensus.Weight 30%Relying on Ethereum PoS · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The token has been online for about 4 years and operates stably.Weight 15%About 4 years · 70 / 100

Recent upgrades?The token itself has no independent technical upgrades and relies on the underlying chain.Weight 35%No major independent upgrades · 40 / 100

Client Diversity?The token itself has no client and relies on the Ethereum network.Weight 20%Rely on Ethereum diversity · 60 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?As ecosystem fuel, there is consumption, but no clear deflation.Weight 30%There is a consumption mechanism · 60 / 100

Inflation rate?The annual issuance is enormous, leading to high inflation.Weight 25%About 74% (High) · 20 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of clear staking or lock-up data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a 10-year issuance limit, but not an absolute hard cap.Weight 20%About 36.5 million in 10 years · 70 / 100

Core Development Team?The core development team has limited public information but some visibility.Weight 30%Limited team information · 65 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance intensity received a positive safety rating and was community-driven.Weight 25%Community-Driven (Security Rating 78) · 78 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of public transparency in fund usage.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Concentration of key people?Lack of data on the concentration of key individuals.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Active Address?Lack of data on token-active addresses.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The token is deployed on three chains: Ethereum, Polygon, and Ronin.Weight 25%3. Chains · 75 / 100

DeFi TVL?The model evaluates the DeFi ecosystem with a score of 70, but the token itself is not the core DeFi core.Weight 25%Approximately 70 (model points) · 70 / 100

Developer community?Lack of Github data, unclear developer community activity.Weight 20%Slightly low (missing GitHub) · 50 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%No public record · 80 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The overall crypto regulatory environment is complex, and tokens lack clear regulatory definitions.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 50 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC is cautious about crypto assets, with tokens lacking clear certainty.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 50 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?As an ERC-20 token, client stability depends on Ethereum.Weight 15%Depends on Ethereum · 70 / 100