BitMart BMX

Ethereum EcosystemCeFiCEX

BitMart leads thanks to its team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding a D- rating.

Rating updated 2026-07-28
D-21.72 / 100

Sector Rank #823 · Global Rank #1566

Roadmap Delivery0F
Technical Implementation----
Tokenomics0F
Team Governance71.54C-
Market Ecosystem52.98E-
Security & Compliance0F
01

Overall Rating

D- · 21.72 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
71.54
Market Ecosystem
52.98
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
21.72

BitMart has an overall rating D-f D (total 21.72), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).

Rating Team Conclusion: "BitMart has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery, but its current weaknesses are mainly in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

0/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and delivery records makes it impossible to assessWeight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade information and delivery status makes it impossible to assessWeight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public information on pending delivery milestonesWeight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical delay recordsWeight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Technical Implementation

56.75/100

Consensus Mechanism?As an ERC20 token, it benefits from Ethereum's PoS mechanismWeight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The token launched in 2018 and runs on the mature Ethereum mainnetWeight 15%About 8 years (Ethereum) · 85 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of token contracts or details on core platform technology upgradesWeight 35%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Client Diversity?As an ERC20 token, this metric does not directly applyWeight 20%Not applicable · 50 / 100

Tokenomics

0/100

Deflationary Mechanism?Contracts have rights for additional issuance and lack clear deflationary mechanismsWeight 30%Additional issuance is possible, but the deflationary mechanism is unclear · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Contracts can be issued additionally, posing potential inflation risksWeight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up rate is extremely low, and the market liquidity is highWeight 25%to be on the low side · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?The contract has additional issuance rights and no fixed supply capWeight 20%No hardtop (can be issued additionally) · 0 / 100

Team Governance

70.75/100

Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and VC endorsementsWeight 30%The team has a strong background · 75 / 100

Governance mechanisms?As a CEX token, its governance mechanism is highly centralizedWeight 25%Centralized Governance · 70 / 100

Financial Transparency?Funding transparency is acceptable, but there is still room for improvementWeight 25%Normal · 75 / 100

Concentration of key people?The top ten crypto-holding addresses are highly concentrated and face centralization risksWeight 20%High · 60 / 100

Market Ecosystem

53.75/100

Active Address?Daily active addresses performed decentlyWeight 30%Moderately active · 85 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Ecosystem integration is average, and cross-chain liquidity needs improvementWeight 25%Somewhat less · 60 / 100

DeFi TVL?As a CEX token, DeFi TVL data does not apply directly, but it does involve some ecosystem participationWeight 25%Insufficient data · 45 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public developer activity and code contributionsWeight 20%Inactive · 10 / 100

Security & Compliance

0/100

Historical Major Failure?In 2021, a major security incident occurred, resulting in enormous lossesWeight 25%Existence (2021 Hacking) · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The contract has rights for additional issuance, posing potential regulatory risksWeight 30%Unfriendly (has permission to post additional posts) · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The contract has rights for additional issuance and may be classified as a security by the SECWeight 30%Unfriendly (has permission to post additional posts) · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public information on the frequency of client bugsWeight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

04

D- Peer Comparison

Export CSV
BitMartD- · 21.72RogueD- · 26.66GaiAID- · 26.65Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64
Overall Score21.7226.6626.6526.64
Roadmap Delivery037.537.537.5
Technical Implementation--------
Tokenomics0000
Team Governance71.54305670.72
Market Ecosystem52.989.6359.9851.84
Security & Compliance051.7500

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions