Blocksquare BST

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available recent milestone delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of publicly available information on recent upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Disclosure of pending delivery milestone information is unclear.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on Ethereum's PoS mechanism, it offers high security.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a relatively short time but has stabilized.Weight 15%About 2.2 years · 70 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of publicly available recent upgrade quality assessment data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?As an Ethereum ecosystem token, it benefits from the diversity of Ethereum clients.Weight 20%High (Ethereum dependent) · 85 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%No clear mechanism · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?The contract has additional issuance rights and carries potential inflation risks.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, lacking long-term holding incentives.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 18 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Although there is a supply cap, the contract can be issued additionally, and the upper limit is not strict.Weight 20%100 million (can be issued additionally) · 20 / 100

Core Development Team?Limited information on core team members, insufficient development activity data.Weight 30%The core team is relatively small in size · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are relatively centralized but highly transparent.Weight 25%Centralized Governance · 86 / 100

Financial Transparency?Funds are highly transparent, but there is no public information on financing rounds.Weight 25%Relatively high · 86 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contract owner addresses exist, and key person authority concentration is moderate.Weight 20%Normal · 50 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is moderate, and user engagement needs improvement.Weight 30%Normal · 64.2 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Mainly deployed on Ethereum, with low cross-chain and third-party integration.Weight 25%Single Chain (Ethereum) · 10 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project itself has no direct DeFi TVL and benefits from the Ethereum ecosystem.Weight 25%Insufficient data (reliance on Ethereum) · 80 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract has the authority to issue additional rights, posing a significant security risk.Weight 25%There is a risk of privilege leakage · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?RWA tokens are facing increasingly stringent global regulatory scrutiny.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on RWA tokens may be more cautious.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100