Celestia TIA

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Key milestones are delivered on schedule, demonstrating strong execution.Weight 35%High · 75 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, a data availability protocol was released, and core functions continue to iterate.Weight 30%Good, with important technical updates · 75 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There is a clear expansion plan, but it is still ongoing.Weight 20%It exists, but there is a clear plan · 70 / 100

History Extension Record?The project has a good track record of deliveries, with no major delays.Weight 15%No obvious delays · 80 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Adopts the mature Tendermint BFT consensus, ensuring high security.Weight 30%PoS (Tendermint BFT) · 80 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but has been market-validated.Weight 15%About 2.6 years · 65 / 100

Recent upgrades?Fibre Blockspace enhances data availability and demonstrates strong technological innovation.Weight 35%Important upgrades, enhanced features · 75 / 100

Client Diversity?There is a lack of public data on client diversity, creating uncertainty.Weight 20%Data is insufficient and may be somewhat lacking · 60 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Currently, no clear token burn or deflationary mechanism has been found.Weight 30%No explicit deflation mechanism · 70 / 100

Inflation rate?As a PoS chain, inflation exists, but specific inflation rate data is missing.Weight 25%Yes, but specific data is insufficient · 75 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of public staking rate data, but healthy staking activity is expected.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 80 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is no strict cap on token supply, but there is a clear issuance mechanism.Weight 20%No rigid upper limit · 75 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are open and transparent, with strong backgrounds and rich experience.Weight 30%The team is experienced and transparent · 75 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Adopts on-chain governance mechanisms, with a good security rating.Weight 25%On-chain governance (Good) · 70 / 100

Financial Transparency?Multiple rounds of financing information are open and transparent, with participation from top institutions.Weight 25%High and multiple rounds of financing information are disclosed · 75 / 100

Concentration of key people?Core team members are clear, but governance mechanisms spread some of the risks.Weight 20%Moderately low · 70 / 100

Active Address?It lacks active address data, but its market ranking shows it has a certain user base.Weight 30%Insufficient data, moderate market ranking · 75 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As a modular DA layer, it has integrated multiple mainstream Rollup ecosystems.Weight 25%Supports mainstream Rollup ecosystems · 95 / 100

DeFi TVL?As a DA layer, DeFi TVL is mainly reflected in its ecosystem projects.Weight 25%Non-direct DeFi platforms lack sufficient data · 75 / 100

Developer community?High social media attention, but insufficient GitHub activity data.Weight 20%The community is active, but GitHub data is missing · 80 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Safety Score: High safety rating, no major security incidents detected.Weight 25%No major safety incidents · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory guidance has led the industry as a whole to adopt a cautious attitude.Weight 30%Neutral and cautious · 80 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on crypto assets remains unclear, raising potential regulatory risks.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 75 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of direct data, but the security score is high for code security ratings.Weight 15%Data is insufficient, but the code security rating is high · 85 / 100