
Celsius Network CEL
Celsius Network leads in team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently firmly holding an E+ rating.
Sector Rank #1063 · Global Rank #1917
Overall Rating
E+ · 16.21 / 100Celsius Network has an overall rating E+f E (total 16.21), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Celsius Network has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?The project is bankrupt, with no active development or roadmap delivery.Weight 35%No active roadmap · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?The project has ceased operations and has not been upgraded or delivered in the near future.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?The project has ceased operations and is not yet to be delivered as a milestone.Weight 20%&None · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?The project has gone bankrupt, and the historical delivery record is meaningless.Weight 15%The project has been halted · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
35.5/100Consensus Mechanism?As an ERC-20 token, it relies on the underlying chain consensus mechanism.Weight 30%ERC-20 (Dependency on Underlying Chains) · 60 / 100
Main network years of operation?The token has been around for a long time, but the project has ceased operations.Weight 15%Approximately 8 years (2018-2026) · 50 / 100
Recent upgrades?The project has ceased operations and has no recent upgrades.Weight 35%&None · 0 / 100
Client Diversity?As an ERC-20 token, it has no independent client diversity.Weight 20%Not applicable · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
0/100Deflationary Mechanism?The project has ceased operations, and the token has no explicit deflation mechanism.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?The contract has additional issuance rights and carries potential inflation risks.Weight 25%may be increased in number · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The project has ceased operations and has no active staking or lock-up mechanisms.Weight 25%&None · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Contracts can be issued additionally, with no strict upper limit on token supply.Weight 20%Can be reissued, no hardtop · 0 / 100
Team Governance
17.5/100Core Development Team?The project has gone bankrupt, and the core development team has either been disbanded or stalled.Weight 30%During team restructuring, development stalled · 10 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Centralized governance, with contracts hiding owner privileges.Weight 25%Centralized, with hidden owners · 20 / 100
Financial Transparency?Historical financial transparency is decent, but the financial situation after project bankruptcy is complicated.Weight 25%Historical transparency is moderate, but current financial status is unclear · 30 / 100
Concentration of key people?Contracts have hidden owners, with highly concentrated control.Weight 20%Highly concentrated · 10 / 100
Market Ecosystem
31.01/100Active Address?The number of active addresses is moderately low, indicating insufficient ecosystem activity.Weight 30%Moderately low · 49.2 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The token is deployed on multiple mainstream chains and has certain cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%5 chains · 60 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project has ceased operations, and DeFi ecosystem TVL data is insufficient and expected to be extremely low.Weight 25%Data is insufficient, and the forecast is extremely low · 5 / 100
Developer community?The project has ceased operations, and the developer community is inactive.Weight 20%Inactive · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
8.25/100Historical Major Failure?The project has experienced a major bankruptcy event, resulting in damage to user assets.Weight 25%There are major bankruptcy events · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?The project faced strict scrutiny from regulatory authorities in multiple countries due to bankruptcy.Weight 30%Unfriendly · 10 / 100
Sec Attitude?The project faces strict SEC scrutiny due to bankruptcy and its operating model.Weight 30%Unfriendly · 10 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Contracts have hidden owners and additional issuance permissions, posing high security risks.Weight 15%There is a risk of contract permission · 15 / 100
E+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV Celsius NetworkE+ · 16.21 | Main Street USDE+ · 19.99 | GoGoPoolE+ · 19.98 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 16.21 | 19.99 | 19.98 | 19.98 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 37.5 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0.7 | 0 | 1.56 | 28 |
| Team Governance | 52.4 | 30 | 52.8 | 68.32 |
| Market Ecosystem | 39.48 | 45.95 | 36.53 | 1.02 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |


Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.