Centrifuge CFG

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap delivery data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of technical upgrade details makes it impossible to assess delivery status.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public pending delivery milestone information makes it impossible to assess future plans.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?The lack of publicly available historical delay records makes it impossible to assess project management capabilities.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?It adopts a mature Ethereum PoS mechanism, offering high security.Weight 30%PoS (Ethereum) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a short runtime, and historical data accumulation and stability verification are insufficient.Weight 15%About 0.7 years · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data poses potential centralization risks.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%No clear deflation · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?The contract has additional issuance rights and carries potential inflation risks.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 20 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?On-chain data shows that the token lock rate is extremely low.Weight 25%About 0% · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is no strict supply cap for tokens, so additional issuance is possible.Weight 20%No hardtop · 45 / 100

Core Development Team?Team members come from diverse backgrounds and have endorsements from well-known VCs.Weight 30%The team has a strong background · 50 / 100

Governance mechanisms?There is a lack of public, detailed information on governance mechanisms.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of transparency in fund usage prevents assessment of fund management.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Concentration of key people?The contract has the ability to hide the owner and change balance status.Weight 20%Risk of centralization · 0 / 100

Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%85.51 / 100 · 85.5 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed on multiple mainstream chains, with a strong cross-chain ecosystem.Weight 25%4. Chains · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi has a relatively high total value locked, indicating that the project has a certain scale in the RWA sector.Weight 25%$1.478 billion · 70 / 100

Developer community?Developer activity data is missing or activity levels are low.Weight 20%Low activity · 30 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There have been incidents of social media accounts being hacked, with permission leakage red-line vulnerabilities.Weight 25%There was a case where an X account was hacked · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory attitude information and safety red lines.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?There is a lack of clear SEC stance and safety red lines.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of client bug frequency data and a security red line.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100