Clearpool CPOOL

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of publicly available near-term roadmap milestone data, making it impossible to assess.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends are not active, and the record of upgrade deliveries is unclear.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public information on pending delivery milestones and insufficient transparency.Weight 20%Lack of public information · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public historical delay records, making it impossible to assess them.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Relying on Ethereum's mature PoS consensus mechanism, it offers high security.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a long operating time and has been market-validated.Weight 15%About 4.5 years · 80 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed information about recent upgrades and quality assessment data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Client Diversity?Relying on the diversity of clients in the Ethereum ecosystem, it has a solid foundation.Weight 20%Depends on Ethereum · 85 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of clear token burn or deflationary mechanisms and weak value capture capability.Weight 30%No clear deflation · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?The token is fully in circulation, with no new supply, and the inflation rate is zero.Weight 25%0% (fully circulated) · 100 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of clear staking or lock-up data, and the lock-up ratio is extremely low.Weight 25%Low / Insufficient data · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to long-term value stability.Weight 20%1 billion CPOOL · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and are backed by well-known VCs.Weight 30%Experienced and backed by VCs · 75 / 100

Governance mechanisms?It adopts a token governance model, with high governance intensity and authenticity.Weight 25%Token Governance (CPOOL) · 88 / 100

Financial Transparency?Proposal voting and fund pools are highly transparent and information is open.Weight 25%Relatively high · 88 / 100

Concentration of key people?The core team is relatively small, posing a certain risk of key personnel concentration.Weight 20%Slightly high · 40 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is good, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%Good · 85.3 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Multiple mainstream chains and L2s have been deployed, with a high degree of ecosystem integration.Weight 25%5+ chains · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi's total locked value is moderate, leaving room for growth.Weight 25%Approximately 40 million USD · 60 / 100

Developer community?Lack of active developer community data and insufficient development activity.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 20 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are currently no major security incident records, and audit scores are relatively high.Weight 25%&None · 95 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance information and uncertainty.Weight 30%There is controversy / insufficient data · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?The lack of clear SEC judgment on the nature of its token poses potential risks.Weight 30%There is controversy / insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of public data on the frequency of client bugs, making it impossible to evaluate.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 20 / 100