Cocoro COCORO

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Meme coin projects usually lack detailed roadmaps and lack sufficient data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?No recent public upgrade records or development activities.Weight 30%No clear upgrades · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestone plans were found.Weight 20%&None · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?Meme coin projects usually lack detailed roadmaps and lack sufficient data.Weight 15%No public record · 20 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Inheriting Ethereum's PoS mechanism, it offers high security and good decentralization.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has only been running for a short time, and historical data accumulation is limited.Weight 15%About 1.2 years · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?No recent public technical upgrades, and development activity is inactive.Weight 35%No clear upgrades · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?As a token on the Base chain, it inherits the diversity advantages of Ethereum clients.Weight 20%Relying on Base/Ethereum · 80 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflationary mechanisms or value capture designs were found.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Although there is a fixed supply, there is a lack of burn or value capture mechanisms.Weight 25%0 (Fixed Supply) · 10 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No significant token staking or lock-up mechanisms were found.Weight 25%Very Low · 5 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a fixed supply cap, but token empowerment is lacking.Weight 20%1 Billion (Fixed) · 10 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team's background information is limited, lacking endorsements from well-known developers or institutions.Weight 30%General background · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Project governance is centralized, but funding and proposal transparency are relatively high.Weight 25%Centralized (High Transparency) · 50 / 100

Financial Transparency?Transparency in fund usage and proposal voting is high.Weight 25%Relatively high · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?There is a lack of multi-signature protection, and there is a certain degree of centralization risk.Weight 20%Slightly high · 40 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is extremely small, and user engagement is low.Weight 30%Very Low · 5 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project ecosystem is limited to the Base chain, with low cross-chain integration.Weight 25%Single (Base) · 10 / 100

DeFi TVL?Non-DeFi projects, no relevant TVL data.Weight 25%&None · 0 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public codebases and active developer communities.Weight 20%Inactive · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?So far, no publicly available major security incident records have been found.Weight 25%&None · 95 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?As a meme coin, it lacks clear regulatory compliance information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?Meme coins carry the potential risk of being classified as securities by the SEC.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?The project has no independent client, relies on the underlying chain security, and has a low frequency of inherent bugs.Weight 15%Low (Dependence on Base) · 80 / 100