AVA (Travala) AVA
AVA (Travala) leads in market ecosystem and roadmap delivery, with safety and compliance remaining the main focus, currently holding a solid D- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D-26.56 / 100
Sector Rank #597 · Global Rank #1200
Overall Rating
D- · 26.56 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
5.73
Team Governance
30
Market Ecosystem
69.01
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
26.56
AVA (Travala) has an overall rating D-f D (total score 26.56), ranking highly in six dimensions for market ecosystem, roadmap delivery, and team governance. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "AVA (Travala) has relative advantages in market ecosystem, roadmap delivery, and team governance, but its current shortcomings are focused on security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
37/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Development activity trends are zero, and delivery capability is questionable.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity has stalled, and upgrades have been scarce.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public milestones makes it impossible to assess.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of public records, but development stagnation suggests possible delays.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Technical Implementation
64.75/100Consensus Mechanism?Inheriting Ethereum's PoS mechanism, it offers high security.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a long runtime and has been validated by the market.Weight 15%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgrade information has stalled development activity.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Diversity?As an ERC-20 token, it benefits from the diversity of Ethereum clients.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Tokenomics
7.25/100Deflationary Mechanism?Contracts have the ability to issue additional issues without a clear deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Inflation rate?Contracts can be issued additionally, posing potential inflation risks.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, and the market liquidity is high.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a theoretical upper limit, but contracts can be issued additionally without strict limits.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Team Governance
32/100Core Development Team?Team members are public, but development information is not transparent.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The project is highly centralized and lacks decentralized governance mechanisms.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Financial Transparency?Lack of public information on fund usage and transparency.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten crypto-holding addresses are highly concentrated and face centralization risks.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Market Ecosystem
69/100Active Address?High daily active addresses and good user engagement.Weight 30%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream chains and has certain cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?There is a lack of clear DeFi TVL data, but as an ERC-20, it has some liquidity.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Developer community?There is a lack of publicly available active data, but the project is still running.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?Contracts can be issued additionally, posing significant security risks.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?The ability to issue additional contracts may spark regulatory controversy.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC may have an unfriendly attitude toward tokens that can be issued as incrementary.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency and core security risks in the project.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| AVA (Travala)D- · 26.56 |  RogueD- · 26.66 |  GaiAID- · 26.65 |  Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 26.56 | 26.66 | 26.65 | 26.64 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 5.73 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 30 | 56 | 70.72 |
| Market Ecosystem | 69.01 | 9.63 | 59.98 | 51.84 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.