Cronos CRO

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Recent roadmap delivery data is missing, and historical milestones have been slightly delayed.Weight 35%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There was a recent clear EVM mainnet upgrade, but other events were not technical deliveries.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There are no pending deliverables in the public GitHub milestones, which may lack a public roadmap.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

History Extension Record?Historical records show that there was a slight delay in one milestone delivery.Weight 15%60 / 100 · 60 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?It adopts a mature Tendermint PoS consensus mechanism, offering high security.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running stably for about 4.5 years, accumulating operational experience.Weight 15%80 / 100 · 80 / 100

Recent upgrades?The recent Smarturn upgrade quality is average, and the code update quality score is low.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?The lack of publicly available client-side diversity data may pose the risk of a single client.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?It lacks a deflationary mechanism, and there have been proposals to resume token burning.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?The circulating supply is far below the total supply, and the top ten crypto-holding addresses account for a very high proportion.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?It lacks staking rate data, and the top ten token-holding addresses account for as much as 96.42%.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply ceiling, but the total is huge, and other economic model indicators are extremely poor.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team background and VC endorsement scores are relatively low, lacking prominent advantages.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The project is highly centralized and lacks transparent data on governance voting.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Financial Transparency?There is only early financing data, lacking transparency in treasury balances and operating expenditures.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contracts can be issued additionally and have a single owner's address, posing risks of centralized control.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Active Address?Daily active addresses score low, indicating insufficient market activity.Weight 30%7 / 100 · 7 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The number of third-party integrations scores low, indicating that the ecosystem's scalability needs improvement.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi's total locked value is extremely low, and its ecosystem lacks appeal.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100

Developer community?GitHub has few stars and branches, and developer community activity is average.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract allows token issuance, posing a significant risk of permission leakage.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory stance toward Cronos, and the overall crypto regulatory environment is relatively cautious.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC lacks a clear stance on Cronos, but there are disputes over the securities attributes of similar projects.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of direct data on client bug frequency makes accurate assessment impossible.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100