Falcon USD USDF
Falcon USD leads thanks to its team governance and economic model, with security and compliance remaining the main focus and currently holding a solid D- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D-23.2 / 100
Sector Rank #31 · Global Rank #1466
Overall Rating
D- · 23.2 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
41.25
Team Governance
69.52
Market Ecosystem
2.82
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
23.2
Falcon USD has an overall rating D-f D (total 23.21), ranking highly in six dimensions for team governance, economic model, and roadmap delivery. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Falcon USD has relative advantages in team governance, economic modeling, and roadmap delivery, but current shortcomings focus on security and compliance. " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
37/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap delivery data, inactive development activities.Weight 35%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There are no significant recent updates or delivery records, and codebase activity is insufficient.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public pending delivery milestone information makes it impossible to assess progress.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
History Extension Record?Development activity is inactive, and there may be historical delays.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Technical Implementation
51/100Consensus Mechanism?The PoSA mechanism relies on BNB Chain, mature but with risks of centralization.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime and still needs time to verify stability.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of public upgrade information and codebase activity makes it impossible to assess.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Client Diversity?As tokens on BNB Chain, client diversity depends on the underlying chain.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Tokenomics
22.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?Mainly yields through staking, lacking a clear token burn mechanism.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Inflation rate?The contract has the right to issue additional tokens, which poses a significant risk for stablecoins.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, and there is potential future unlocking, which may face selling pressure.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Contracts can be issued in additional quantities, with no fixed supply cap, and there is an inflation risk.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Team Governance
68.75/100Core Development Team?Core team members are publicly disclosed, but there is a lack of open codebase development activities.Weight 30%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Governance is highly transparent, but specific mechanism details are unclear.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Financial Transparency?Financing information is disclosed, and fund management transparency is relatively high.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Concentration of key people?Contract ownership is concentrated, posing a risk of a single point of failure.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Market Ecosystem
2.8/100Active Address?The number of active on-chain addresses is extremely low, and user participation is insufficient.Weight 30%1 / 100 · 1 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple chains, but has zero third-party integrations and poor ecosystem scalability.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for the project itself, suggesting a small scale.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Developer community?Lack of public codebase activity and inactive developer communities.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?The contract has the authority to issue additional rights, posing a significant security risk.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Large-scale stablecoins face strict regulation and extremely high compliance risks.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC has an unfriendly attitude toward additional stablecoins, posing securities risks.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public codebase activity makes it impossible to assess bug frequency.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Falcon USDD- · 23.2 |  RogueD- · 26.66 |  GaiAID- · 26.65 |  Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 23.2 | 26.66 | 26.65 | 26.64 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 41.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 69.52 | 30 | 56 | 70.72 |
| Market Ecosystem | 2.82 | 9.63 | 59.98 | 51.84 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.