FLOKI FLOKI

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public roadmap delivery data, making it impossible to evaluate.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?GitHub development activity trends are zero and cannot be assessed.Weight 30%No obvious activity · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical delay records, making it impossible to assess.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a token, the consensus mechanism relies on the underlying public chain.Weight 30%Depends on the underlying chain · 50 / 100

Main network years of operation?FLOKI is a token with no independent mainnet operating years.Weight 15%There is no dedicated mainnet · 0 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of public information on recent contract upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?As a token, there is no independent client diversity to assess.Weight 20%Not applicable · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?The model shows weak value capture capability and poor performance.Weight 30%The effect is poor · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?The maximum supply matches the total supply, with no significant inflation.Weight 25%No obvious inflation · 80 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The total value locked is extremely low relative to market value, and the lock-up rate is extremely low.Weight 25%Very Low · 5 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to value stability.Weight 20%There is an upper limit · 100 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members' background information is publicly disclosed and they have some experience.Weight 30%A good background · 70 / 100

Governance mechanisms?High transparency of governance mechanisms and good community engagement.Weight 25%High transparency · 90 / 100

Financial Transparency?Good financial transparency, with publicly available financing information.Weight 25%Good · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contracts carry backdoor code risks, which may lead to centralized control.Weight 20%Normal · 60 / 100

Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%Good · 85 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Although multi-chain deployments are deployed, cross-chain interoperability and liquidity scores are low.Weight 25%Multi-chain deployment, but poor interoperability · 30 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi's total value locked is relatively low compared to market capitalization, and ecosystem integration is insufficient.Weight 25%Lower · 10 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract contains backdoor code, posing a significant security risk.Weight 25%There is a risk of backdoor code · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Backdoor code exists, and regulatory compliance is extremely poor.Weight 30%Extremely unfriendly · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Backdoor codes exist, and the SEC has identified them as high-risk securities.Weight 30%Extremely unfriendly · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?As a token, there is no independent client bug frequency to evaluate.Weight 15%Not applicable · 50 / 100