Impossible Cloud Network Token ICNT

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of a public roadmap and timely data delivery result in low development activity.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery records, low development activity.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on mature Ethereum and Base chains, it adopts a PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a short runtime and is still in its early stages.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?As tokens in the Ethereum and Base ecosystems, client diversity depends on the underlying chain.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?The circulating supply is far below the total supply, posing inflationary pressure from future token unlocks.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of public staking or staking data, with contracts showing no stakes.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to long-term value stability.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team has a limited number of members, and the development background scores are relatively low.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms exist, but safety scores show room for improvement.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100

Financial Transparency?Financial transparency is at a moderate level, with room for improvement.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100

Concentration of key people?The contract has the ability to hide the owner and modify balances, resulting in high concentration.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is at a moderate level.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on Ethereum and Base chains, but there are zero third-party integrations.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is not DeFi and lacks its own TVL data.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Developer community?The GitHub repository is empty, and developer activity is extremely low.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract carries a risk of permission leakage, triggering a security red line.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There are serious security loopholes and extremely low regulatory compliance.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?There are serious security vulnerabilities, and the SEC's attitude may be unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of public code and there is a risk of permission leakage.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100