JasmyCoin JASMY

Ethereum EcosystemInternet of ThingsData Market

JasmyCoin leads in security, compliance, and team governance, with its economic model remaining a key focus, currently holding a solid C- rating.

Rating updated 2026-08-03
C-41.31 / 100

Sector Rank #164 · Global Rank #449

Roadmap Delivery37.5F
Technical Implementation----
Tokenomics17.82F
Team Governance54.8E
Market Ecosystem29.53F
Security & Compliance62.6D-
01

Overall Rating

C- · 41.31 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
17.82
Team Governance
54.8
Market Ecosystem
29.53
Security & Compliance
62.6
Overall Score
41.31

JasmyCoin has an overall rating C-f C (total 42.53), ranking highly in six dimensions for security compliance, team governance, and roadmap delivery. The main deduction points are in the economic model (17.82 points)—mainly influenced by short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points) and value capture (0 points).

Rating Team Conclusion: "JasmyCoin has relative advantages in security compliance, team governance, and roadmap delivery, but its current weaknesses are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

36.9/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public, detailed roadmaps and delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 35 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of publicly available information on recent upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 38 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 35 / 100

Technical Implementation

73.75/100

Consensus Mechanism?As an Ethereum ecosystem token, it benefits from the Ethereum PoS mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The token has been online since early 2021 and has been running for a long time.Weight 15%About 5 years · 75 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of public information on the quality and impact of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?As an Ethereum token, it benefits from the diversity of Ethereum clients.Weight 20%High (benefiting from Ethereum) · 90 / 100

Tokenomics

14.25/100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%&None · 5 / 100

Inflation rate?Supply is near the upper limit, but market demand is insufficient.Weight 25%Very Low (Almost Fully Available) · 30 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, and the market circulation is large.Weight 25%Very Low · 5 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear fixed supply cap, but the total volume is huge.Weight 20%50 billion (fixed) · 20 / 100

Team Governance

53/100

Core Development Team?The core team has limited information, and GitHub development activity is extremely low.Weight 30%Small scale, low development activity · 10 / 100

Governance mechanisms?High governance intensity scores in safety scores indicate a sound governance mechanism.Weight 25%Good (Safety Score, High Score) · 92 / 100

Financial Transparency?High scores for financial transparency, and financial management is transparent.Weight 25%High · 92 / 100

Concentration of key people?Limited team size information and risk of key personnel concentration.Weight 20%medium-high · 20 / 100

Market Ecosystem

32/100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is moderate, and ecosystem participation is average.Weight 30%Normal · 50 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Mainly deployed on Ethereum, with low cross-chain and L2 integration.Weight 25%Single (Ethereum) · 10 / 100

DeFi TVL?Non-core DeFi assets, lacking direct DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data (non-DeFi core assets) · 50 / 100

Developer community?GitHub development activity is extremely low, and the developer community is inactive.Weight 20%Inactive · 10 / 100

Security & Compliance

60.75/100

Historical Major Failure?So far, no major public security incidents have been found.Weight 25%&None · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear compliance information and a cautious regulatory environment.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 40 / 100

Sec Attitude?As a token, its securities attributes are disputed in the United States.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 40 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lacking direct data but benefiting from Ethereum client stability.Weight 15%Insufficient data (benefiting from Ethereum) · 95 / 100

04

C- Peer Comparison

Export CSV
JasmyCoinC- · 41.31DODOC- · 46.61BasenjiC- · 46.54OKZOOC- · 46.47
Overall Score41.3146.6146.5446.47
Roadmap Delivery37.503037.5
Technical Implementation--------
Tokenomics17.8266.7924.531.07
Team Governance54.890.3751.656.4
Market Ecosystem29.5391.655.0167.44
Security & Compliance62.6060.4560.5

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions