LayerZero ZRO

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available near-term roadmaps and delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of publicly available recent upgrade details and code activity.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?An innovative cross-chain communication mechanism relying on decentralized oracles and repeaters.Weight 30%Oracle/Relayer mechanism · 75 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but has already demonstrated stability.Weight 15%About 1.5 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of publicly available recent upgrade details and code activity data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?There is a lack of public data on the diversity of oracle/repeater clients.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a token burn mechanism that helps capture value.Weight 30%Presence (strong) · 90 / 100

Inflation rate?There is ongoing token unlocking, bringing inflationary pressures.Weight 25%Higher (unlocked) · 30 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of public staking or lock-up data, or the proportion is relatively low.Weight 25%Data is insufficient or undervalued · 30 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear token supply cap and a fixed total supply.Weight 20%1 billion (hardtop) · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are open and have a good background.Weight 30%The core team is open and transparent · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?DAO governance is adopted, but referendum participation needs improvement.Weight 25%DAO Governance (Engagement Needs Improvement) · 70 / 100

Financial Transparency?Received multiple rounds of investment from well-known institutions, ensuring high transparency of funds.Weight 25%Gao (Well-known Institutional Investment) · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?The top ten have a high proportion of holdings, indicating a certain degree of concentration.Weight 20%Existence (Top 10 Holdings) · 60 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is performing well and user engagement is high.Weight 30%Activity level is good · 75 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has integrated multiple mainstream blockchains, with extensive ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%Multi-chain ecosystem (7+ items) · 80 / 100

DeFi TVL?As an interoperability protocol, it indirectly reflects cross-chain liquidity.Weight 25%Indirect TVL (Cross-chain Liquidity) · 40 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Data is insufficient or underestimated · 20 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Safety score: High safety rating, currently no major security incidents.Weight 25%No major events have occurred yet · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory information and uncertainty.Weight 30%There is controversy / insufficient data · 20 / 100

Sec Attitude?The lack of clear SEC stance raises potential regulatory risks.Weight 30%There is controversy / insufficient data · 20 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lacking data on client bug frequency, but the code security rating is good.Weight 15%Insufficient data (code is securely defying) · 70 / 100