
Treasure MAGIC
Treasure leads in team governance and market ecosystem performance, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding a D rating.
Sector Rank #446 · Global Rank #952
Overall Rating
D · 30.02 / 100Treasure overall rating D (total 30.02), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Treasure has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery, but its current weaknesses are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
45.5/100路线图按期交付率?缺乏公开的详细路线图和交付记录。Weight 35%数据不足 · 50 / 100
近 4 次升级达成?缺乏近期升级的详细交付信息。Weight 30%数据不足 · 50 / 100
待交付里程碑?缺乏公开的待交付里程碑信息。Weight 20%数据不足 · 50 / 100
历史延期记录?曾因财务危机调整项目计划,影响交付。Weight 15%存在重大调整 · 20 / 100
Technical Implementation
73.25/100共识机制?依赖成熟的以太坊PoS机制,安全性高。Weight 30%依赖底层链 (PoS) · 90 / 100
主网运行年数?主网运行时间较长,经过市场检验。Weight 15%约 5 年 · 85 / 100
最近升级?缺乏近期升级的质量评估数据。Weight 35%数据不足 · 50 / 100
客户端多样性?依赖底层链的客户端多样性,具备一定韧性。Weight 20%依赖底层链 · 80 / 100
Tokenomics
47/100通缩机制?缺乏明确的通缩机制信息。Weight 30%数据不足 · 30 / 100
通胀率?存在少量未流通供应,但有供应上限。Weight 25%存在少量通胀 · 60 / 100
质押率 / 锁仓率?缺乏明确的质押或锁仓数据,或比例偏低。Weight 25%数据不足 / 偏低 · 20 / 100
供应上限?存在明确的供应上限,有助于长期价值。Weight 20%有上限 · 90 / 100
Team Governance
63.75/100核心开发团队?核心团队成员背景信息公开,但执行记录不足。Weight 30%核心团队稳定 · 60 / 100
治理机制?具备社区驱动的DAO治理机制,且治理强度较高。Weight 25%DAO 治理 (强) · 90 / 100
资金透明度?资金透明度较高,有公开融资信息。Weight 25%较高透明度 · 85 / 100
关键人物集中度?代币持有高度集中,存在中心化风险。Weight 20%高度集中 · 10 / 100
Market Ecosystem
69.5/100活跃地址?日活跃地址评分高,表明用户参与度良好。Weight 30%活跃度高 · 95 / 100
生态链 / L2 数量?已部署在多条主流链上,具备一定跨链能力。Weight 25%3 条链 · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?缺乏项目自身在DeFi中的TVL数据。Weight 25%数据不足 · 50 / 100
开发者社区?存在GitHub仓库,但缺乏活跃度数据。Weight 20%存在但活跃度不明 · 55 / 100
Security & Compliance
2.5/100历史重大故障?历史上曾发生重大安全事件,造成资产损失。Weight 25%曾遭攻击 · 10 / 100
监管态度?存在后门代码风险,可能面临监管挑战。Weight 30%存在争议 · 0 / 100
SEC 态度?存在后门代码风险,可能面临SEC的审查。Weight 30%存在争议 · 0 / 100
客户端 Bug 频率?存在后门代码风险,潜在漏洞频率不明。Weight 15%数据不足 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV TreasureD · 30.02 | VOOID · 33.28 | IMOD · 33.25 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 30.02 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 30 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 70.72 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 70.67 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |


Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.