MANTRA MANTRA

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of clear data and inferences based on project activity.Weight 35%Insufficient data, about 60% (estimated) · 60 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, there have been mainnet launches, VASP licenses, and token changes.Weight 30%3/4 (partially achieved) · 70 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public, detailed pending delivery milestone information.Weight 20%Insufficient data (presumed to exist) · 65 / 100

History Extension Record?The mainnet will launch in 2024, with a long interval between the token issuance.Weight 15%Existence (Mainnet Delayed Launch) · 55 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on the Cosmos SDK, it uses the mature Tendermint BFT.Weight 30%PoS (Tendermint BFT) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet launched in October 2024, but the runtime is still short.Weight 15%About 1.6 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Recently, there have been changes and splits in token symbols, as well as upgrades to non-core protocols.Weight 35%Token Changes and Splits (Moderate) · 65 / 100

Client Diversity?The Cosmos SDK ecosystem usually lacks client diversity.Weight 20%Less (usually a single client) · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?The team has burned a large number of tokens, and there is a deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%Existence (Token Burn) · 85 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a lack of publicly available and clear data on inflation rates.Weight 25%Insufficient data (presumed to exist) · 65 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of public staking rate data, making it difficult to assess.Weight 25%Insufficient data (estimated moderate) · 60 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on the 10 billion token supply.Weight 20%10 billion (hard top) · 95 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are public, with good backgrounds and experience.Weight 30%The team is open, transparent, and experienced · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Although there is on-chain governance, the degree of decentralization is questionable.Weight 25%On-chain governance (to be improved) · 60 / 100

Financial Transparency?Financing information is public, but transparency in fund usage requires ongoing attention.Weight 25%Financing information is disclosed, but fund usage remains to be seen · 75 / 100

Concentration of key people?Key figures in early-stage projects are usually more concentrated.Weight 20%Medium (common in early-stage projects) · 70 / 100

Active Address?Lack of publicly available active address data.Weight 30%Insufficient data (estimated moderate) · 60 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As an emerging L1, the number of ecosystem projects is relatively small.Weight 25%Slightly low (RWA L1 is in the early stage) · 55 / 100

DeFi TVL?There is a lack of public DeFi TVL data, and the project is not pure DeFi.Weight 25%Insufficient data (estimated to be low) · 50 / 100

Developer community?There is a conflict in GitHub data; community activity needs to be verified.Weight 20%Medium (GitHub activity to be confirmed) · 65 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There has been a flash crash in the coin price and a record of layoffs.Weight 25%Existence (Coin price crash, layoffs) · 40 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Obtained Dubai VASP license, demonstrating a strong willingness to comply.Weight 30%Friendly (Dubai VASP license) · 80 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC lacks a clear stance on it, presuming it is neutral.Weight 30%Insufficient data (presumed neutral) · 70 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data (estimated moderate) · 60 / 100