Midas mTBILL MTBILL
Midas mTBILL leads in team governance and economic models, with security and compliance remaining the main focus, currently firmly holding an E rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
E10.34 / 100
Sector Rank #1354 · Global Rank #2314
Overall Rating
E · 10.34 / 100Roadmap Delivery
11.25
Tokenomics
14.93
Team Governance
30
Market Ecosystem
8
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
10.34
Midas mTBILL Overall Rating E (total score 10.34), ranking high in team governance, economic model, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Midas mTBILL has relative advantages in team governance, economic modeling, and roadmap delivery, with current weaknesses focused on security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
11.25/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and delivery records makes it impossible to assess.Weight 35%11 / 100 · 11.25 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of public escalation records, making it impossible to assess.Weight 30%11 / 100 · 11.25 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?There is a lack of public milestone information, making it impossible to assess them.Weight 20%11 / 100 · 11.25 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical records of delays, making it impossible to assess.Weight 15%11 / 100 · 11.25 / 100
Technical Implementation
45.5/100Consensus Mechanism?The project inherits Ethereum's mature PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Main network years of operation?The project has been online for a short time, and its stability remains to be seen.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of public contract upgrade records and quality assessments.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Diversity?As a token, it does not directly involve client diversity.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
14.93/100Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflationary mechanism has been found.Weight 30%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a lack of public information on minting or inflation.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, and liquidity is concentrated.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Supply is fixed and scarce.Weight 20%55 / 100 · 54.65 / 100
Team Governance
30/100Core Development Team?Core team background and entrepreneurial experience are scored lower.Weight 30%45 / 100 · 45 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The project has low decentralization and non-transparent governance mechanisms.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Financial Transparency?Lack of data on financial transparency.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten crypto-holding addresses are highly concentrated, posing potential risks.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Market Ecosystem
8/100Active Address?The number of active addresses is extremely low, and market participation is insufficient.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream chains.Weight 25%27 / 100 · 27 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data and non-DeFi projects.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Developer community?Developer communities are inactive, lacking code contributions.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?The contract contains backdoor code and permission leaks, posing extremely high security risks.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Tokenized Treasury bills face strict regulatory scrutiny.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on tokenized securities remains unclear and controversial.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lacking data on client bug frequency but with core security issues.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
E Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Midas mTBILLE · 10.34 |  FAYAE · 13.3 |  PolkaswapE · 13.3 |  GaleonE · 13.28 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 10.34 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 13.28 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 11.25 | 37.5 | 0 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 14.93 | 0 | 24.75 | 0.9 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 30 | 49.6 | 42.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 8 | 17.52 | 8.2 | 9.85 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.