Mina Protocol MINA
Mina Protocol leads in security, compliance, and team governance, with technical implementation remaining a key focus and currently holding a B+ rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-06
B+77.17 / 100
Sector Rank #32 · Global Rank #36
Overall Rating
B+ · 77.17 / 100Roadmap Delivery
72.85
Technical Implementation
67.25
Tokenomics
76.8
Team Governance
77.46
Market Ecosystem
76.73
Security & Compliance
85.66
Overall Score
77.17
Mina Protocol has an overall rating B+f D (total 77.17), ranking high in security compliance, team governance, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction was technical implementation (67.25 points)—a dimension lower than other dimensions in the six-dimensional score.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Mina Protocol has relative advantages in security compliance, team governance, and economic models, but its current weaknesses are mainly in technical implementation." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
73.25/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public, detailed roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent specific upgrade delivery information.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical records of delays, and presumed delays are few.Weight 15%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Technical Implementation
70/100Consensus Mechanism?It adopts PoS consensus combined with zero-knowledge proof technology, offering strong innovation.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating operational experience.Weight 15%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of specific information about the quality and impact of recent upgrades.Weight 35%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Client Diversity?There is a lack of specific data on client diversity.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
77/100Deflationary Mechanism?No clear token deflation mechanism has been found, but inflation is under control.Weight 30%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Inflation rate?The token supply is dynamic, but with a clear low inflation target.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?As a PoS chain, it has a relatively high staking rate but lacks specific data.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is no strict cap on token supply, but the inflation mechanism is reasonably designed.Weight 20%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Team Governance
77.38/100Core Development Team?Core team members are publicly available, but lack specific development activity data.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Community governance mechanisms are in place, with a good safety rating.Weight 25%81 / 100 · 80.5 / 100
Financial Transparency?Financing rounds and investor information are open and transparent.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Concentration of key people?The concentration of key figures is moderate, with no obvious risk.Weight 20%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Market Ecosystem
77.15/100Active Address?There is a lack of public active address data, which is presumed to be at a moderate level.Weight 30%78 / 100 · 78 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As an L1, it focuses on building the zkApps ecosystem and has great potential.Weight 25%82 / 100 · 82 / 100
DeFi TVL?Mina is not a major DeFi platform, and its TVL data is either unsuitable or low.Weight 25%65 / 100 · 65 / 100
Developer community?High social media attention but lack specific developer activity data.Weight 20%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Security & Compliance
86/100Historical Major Failure?Safety Score: High safety rating, no publicly disclosed major fault records found.Weight 25%95 / 100 · 95 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?The overall cryptocurrency regulatory environment is complex, and projects face uncertainty.Weight 30%83 / 100 · 83 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC's regulatory stance on crypto assets remains unclear and uncertain.Weight 30%83 / 100 · 83 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency, but high security rating.Weight 15%83 / 100 · 83 / 100
B+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Mina ProtocolB+ · 77.17 |  Nervos NetworkB+ · 79.75 |  THORChainB+ · 79.75 |  dYdXB+ · 79.54 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 77.17 | 79.75 | 79.75 | 79.54 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 72.85 | 80.34 | 75.46 | 75.72 |
| Technical Implementation | 67.25 | 74.45 | 68.55 | 69.95 |
| Tokenomics | 76.8 | 80.4 | 80.1 | 80.1 |
| Team Governance | 77.46 | 81.69 | 85.87 | 85.67 |
| Market Ecosystem | 76.73 | 76.74 | 80.48 | 80.34 |
| Security & Compliance | 85.66 | 83.77 | 85.03 | 83.41 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.