Notcoin NOT

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?The project is active, with clear future plans and events.Weight 35%There is a clear roadmap, and progress is underway on schedule · 75 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent major events have all been completed as planned, and the project is progressing smoothly.Weight 30%Multiple important milestones have been achieved · 85 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There are clear pending delivery milestones, and the project continues to evolve.Weight 20%There is a clear future plan · 80 / 100

History Extension Record?The project has been online for a short time, with no public delay records yet.Weight 15%No significant delays recorded · 90 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?The PoS mechanism based on TON is mature and highly efficient.Weight 30%PoS (TON) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but has passed the initial test.Weight 15%2 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Recently, there have been important functional expansions and adjustments to economic models.Weight 35%Functional expansion and economic model optimization · 75 / 100

Client Diversity?As a TON ecosystem project, client diversity depends on the TON network.Weight 20%Dependent on TON ecosystem, with moderate diversity · 65 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There was once a 3% reduction in circulating supply, indicating a deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%There is a clear destruction mechanism · 85 / 100

Inflation rate?Total supply is close to its maximum supply, so future inflationary pressures are low.Weight 25%Low, supply close to the upper limit · 80 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of public data on staking or staking and locking, making it impossible to assess them.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to value stability.Weight 20%There is a clear upper limit · 95 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are identifiable but smaller in scale and lack public development activities.Weight 30%The core team is relatively small in size · 60 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Currently, governance is relatively centralized, but there are plans to establish DAOs in the future.Weight 25%Centralized, DAO under construction · 30 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of open sources of funding and access to transparency information.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Concentration of key people?The core team is small in size, with a high concentration of decision-making power among key individuals.Weight 20%Relatively high · 40 / 100

Active Address?It has a large community and user base, with high activity.Weight 30%About millions in the community · 85 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is mainly deployed in the TON ecosystem, which has a single ecosystem.Weight 25%A single TON ecosystem · 50 / 100

DeFi TVL?Notcoin is not a DeFi project, and the TVL metric is not suitable.Weight 25%Non-DeFi projects, TVL does not apply · 50 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public developer community activities and code contributions.Weight 20%Few public developer activities · 30 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The project has been online for a short time and has not yet had any major public safety incidents.Weight 25%No major public faults · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Regulation of game tokens remains unclear, and the TON ecosystem has faced regulatory challenges.Weight 30%There is controversy, and the regulatory environment is complex · 60 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC has generally taken a cautious stance toward crypto assets, and the TON ecosystem has attracted attention.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 55 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of specific data, but the security score of the code is relatively low.Weight 15%Insufficient data, resulting in low code security scores · 50 / 100