Origin Dollar OUSD

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of detailed delivery records for recent upgrades.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical records of project delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on a mature Ethereum PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been operating stably since November 2020.Weight 15%About 5.5 years · 90 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgraded quality assessment data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Client Diversity?As an ERC-20 token, it benefits from Ethereum's client diversity.Weight 20%Good · 90 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?The project description does not explicitly mention a token burn mechanism.Weight 30%No explicit deflation mechanism · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?As a stablecoin, it increases supply through yields from underlying assets.Weight 25%Generate income without a fixed inflation rate · 50 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of public data on staking or hedging, and contracts show very low hedging ratios.Weight 25%Insufficient data, low lock-up rate · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?The supply of stablecoins is adjusted based on market demand and the underlying assets.Weight 20%No fixed upper limit, adjustable as needed · 50 / 100

Core Development Team?The number of core team members is limited, and background information disclosure is insufficient.Weight 30%The team is small in size and has an average background · 50 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Both the security score and internal models indicate high governance intensity.Weight 25%Good, with active community governance · 85 / 100

Financial Transparency?Transparency of funds is high, with clear proposal voting and fund flows.Weight 25%Good · 85 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contract ownership is concentrated, with zero multi-signature ratio, posing a single point risk.Weight 20%It is relatively high, with single-point risk · 10 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is moderate.Weight 30%Activity level is moderate · 79.3 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Currently, it supports both Ethereum and Astar.Weight 25%2. Chains · 50 / 100

DeFi TVL?The total value locked is relatively low, and the market influence is limited.Weight 25%About $7.56 million, which is relatively small in scale · 30 / 100

Developer community?Developer activity is zero, and community activity is low.Weight 20%Development activity is inactive · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Contracts with proxy modes and permission leaks trigger security red lines.Weight 25%There are risks of backdoor code and permission leakage · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Stablecoins face increasingly stringent global regulatory scrutiny.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 50 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on stablecoins and DeFi projects remains unclear and controversial.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 50 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100