Orochi Network ON
Orochi Network leads in team governance and security compliance, with economic models remaining a key focus, currently holding a solid C rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-06
C52.63 / 100
Sector Rank #60 · Global Rank #227
Overall Rating
C · 52.63 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
40.5
Team Governance
79.57
Market Ecosystem
45.22
Security & Compliance
62.22
Overall Score
52.63
Orochi Network has an overall rating Cf C (total score 47.85), ranking high in team governance, security compliance, and market ecosystem across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Orochi Network has relative advantages in team governance, security compliance, and market ecosystem, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
37/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public delivery data, poor development activity trends.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity has been sluggish, lacking information on upgrades.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Technical Implementation
55.5/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on a mature consensus mechanism, the security is relatively high.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a short runtime, and its stability remains to be verified.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgrade quality data and poor development activity.Weight 35%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of public information on client diversity.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
2/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear deflationary mechanism design.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?The circulating supply is far below the total supply, and the release plan is unclear.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of staking data, high concentration of holdings by major players.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a supply cap, but other indicators are performing very poorly.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Team Governance
80.15/100Core Development Team?The core team is publicly available and has received investment from well-known VC institutions.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The governance mechanism is sound, and the safety score ratings indicate good governance intensity.Weight 25%81 / 100 · 80.6 / 100
Financial Transparency?Secured multiple rounds of financing, with good transparency of funds.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Concentration of key people?No obvious risk of ownership concentration was found at the contract level.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Market Ecosystem
54.41/100Active Address?The number of active addresses is at a moderate level.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 49.7 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream public blockchains and L2s, with a high degree of ecosystem integration.Weight 25%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project is positioned as non-DeFi and has no direct TVL data.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Developer community?GitHub development activity is extremely low, and community activity is insufficient.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
42/100Historical Major Failure?Safety score: High safety rating, no public security incidents found.Weight 25%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of regulatory compliance data results in extremely low compliance scores.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Sec Attitude?Lacking clear SEC stance, compliance scores are extremely low.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Security Score: Code has a high security rating and a low frequency of bugs.Weight 15%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
C Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Orochi NetworkC · 52.63 |  Layer3C · 53.24 |  Baby Shark UniverseC · 53.03 |  DevvEC · 52.85 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 52.63 | 53.24 | 53.03 | 52.85 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 | 22.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 40.5 | 20.72 | 37.2 | 58.04 |
| Team Governance | 79.57 | 50.8 | 59.68 | 53.2 |
| Market Ecosystem | 45.22 | 96 | 62.92 | 66.86 |
| Security & Compliance | 62.22 | 62.36 | 60.42 | 52.51 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.