Pieverse PIEVERSE

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of near-term roadmaps and on-time delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of detailed delivery information for the last four upgrades.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of clear information on pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical records of project delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on BNB Chain's PoSA mechanism, it is highly efficient.Weight 30%PoSA (PoS variant) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime and is still in its early stages.Weight 15%About 0.5 years · 30 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed quality assessment data from recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?As a token on BNB Chain, client diversity is moderate.Weight 20%Medium (relying on BNB Chain) · 60 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a token burn mechanism, but the contract can be issued additionally.Weight 30%There is a partial deflationary mechanism · 40 / 100

Inflation rate?Contracts can be issued additionally, and the circulating supply is far below the total supply.Weight 25%Potential inflation present · 20 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, and there is a lack of clear staking data.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 20 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%1 billion · 100 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team has an entrepreneurial background and has received investment from well-known VCs.Weight 30%The team has a strong background and VC support · 95 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance is highly transparent, but the degree of project centralization is relatively high.Weight 25%There is a governance mechanism, but it is highly centralized · 80 / 100

Financial Transparency?Funds are highly transparent, with publicly available financing information.Weight 25%Relatively high · 88 / 100

Concentration of key people?The contract carries the risk of hidden owners and does not have a multi-signature mechanism.Weight 20%Relatively high · 60 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is average and needs improvement.Weight 30%Moderately low · 43.7 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Mainly deployed on BNB Chain and Ethereum, with few third-party integrations.Weight 25%Small amount (BNB Chain, Ethereum) · 30 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is not a typical DeFi and lacks direct TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public GitHub repositories and active developer data.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract carries risks of hidden owner and leakage of issuable permissions.Weight 25%There is a risk of privilege leakage · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of regulatory compliance information for projects in major jurisdictions.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?There is a lack of specific SEC stance or classification information regarding the project.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100