Quant QNT

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data makes it difficult to assess.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 35 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a recent lack of publicly available information on major upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 35 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There is a lack of clear technical milestones pending delivery, only event announcements.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 40 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public historical delay records, making accurate assessment impossible.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As tokens on Ethereum, it inherits Ethereum's mature PoS consensus.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The project has been online since 2018, with the mainnet running for a long time.Weight 15%About 8 years · 90 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of publicly available recent upgrade information and code activity data.Weight 35%Data is insufficient or underwhelming · 20 / 100

Client Diversity?There is a lack of information about the diversity of Quant's own clients.Weight 20%Data is insufficient or underwhelming · 20 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Tokens carry the risk of additional issuance and lack a clear deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%&None · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?Tokens can be issued in additional quantities, posing potential inflation risks.Weight 25%Potential inflation present · 10 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The staking or lock-up rate is extremely low, and the market liquidity is high.Weight 25%0% · 20 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Tokens have clear supply caps.Weight 20%14,612,493 · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?The core development team is low in activity, and GitHub code contributions are insufficient.Weight 30%Weak · 35 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Project governance mechanisms are centralized, but the safety score evaluates strong internal controls.Weight 25%Centralized Governance · 75 / 100

Financial Transparency?Operating funds are highly transparent, but total financing information is lacking.Weight 25%Higher (Operation) · 70 / 100

Concentration of key people?Token holding is highly concentrated, posing potential risks.Weight 20%Relatively high · 40 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is low, and user participation is insufficient.Weight 30%to be on the low side · 20 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The number of ecosystems and third-party integrations is relatively low.Weight 25%Underestimated (2 reviews) · 15 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi TVL is relatively low, and cross-chain liquidity is limited.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 15 / 100

Developer community?Developer communities are low in activity and lack of code contributions.Weight 20%Weak · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Tokens can be issued additionally, triggering a security red line, posing significant security risks.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory attitude information, making it impossible to assess.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?There is a lack of clear SEC stance information, making it impossible to assess.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of client-side bug frequency data makes it impossible to evaluate.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100