Realio Network Token RIO

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 25 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends have been inactive.Weight 30%No obvious upgrades · 15 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%non disclosed · 25 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of historical delivery records, making assessment difficult.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Realio Network is a PoS chain based on the Cosmos SDK.Weight 30%PoS (Tendermint) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been operating since September 2020, which is quite long.Weight 15%About 5.7 years · 80 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgrade details, low development activity.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?The diversity of Cosmos SDK ecosystem clients is usually limited.Weight 20%to be on the low side · 40 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of publicly disclosed details on deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%Unknown · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a lack of public inflation rate data.Weight 25%Unknown · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of staking or locked data, or extremely low proportions.Weight 25%About 0% · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a supply ceiling, but the overall economic model design has serious flaws.Weight 20%175 million · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team is relatively small in size and has limited background information.Weight 30%The scale is relatively small · 50 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance transparency is relatively high, but decentralization is insufficient.Weight 25%Centralized and biased · 70 / 100

Financial Transparency?Medium transparency of funds, average reserve situation.Weight 25%Normal · 60 / 100

Concentration of key people?It has the authority to hide owners and modify balances, resulting in high concentration.Weight 20%Extremely high · 20 / 100

Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%Good · 75 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream chains, with a broad cross-chain ecosystem layout.Weight 25%7 chains · 85 / 100

DeFi TVL?Non-DeFi projects lack relevant TVL data and integration.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public data on developer community activities.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There is a risk of permission leakage, and it is marked as a security red line.Weight 25%There is permission leakage · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Regulatory compliance scores are extremely low, posing significant risks.Weight 30%Unfriendly · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance is unclear, but its compliance score is extremely low.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100