Sign SIGN

Ethereum EcosystemDigital CertificationInfrastructureOn-Chain Financial Solutions

Sign leads in market ecosystem and security compliance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding a D+ rating.

Rating updated 2026-07-29
D+37.64 / 100

Sector Rank #237 · Global Rank #599

Roadmap Delivery0F
Technical Implementation----
Tokenomics0F
Team Governance30F
Market Ecosystem76.95C+
Security & Compliance53.21E-
01

Overall Rating

D+ · 37.64 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
30
Market Ecosystem
76.95
Security & Compliance
53.21
Overall Score
37.64

Sign has an overall rating D+f D (total 38.51), ranking high in market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).

Rating Team Conclusion: "Sign has relative advantages in market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

0/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There are no clear recent records of upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%No clear upgrades · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%&None · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Technical Implementation

66/100

Consensus Mechanism?As a multi-chain token, it relies on mature underlying chain consensus.Weight 30%Dependency on the underlying chain (PoS) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The token has been up for a short time, while the project has been established for a long time.Weight 15%About 1 year (token) · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?The token is deployed on multiple chains including Ethereum, BSC, and Base.Weight 20%Multi-chain deployment · 70 / 100

Tokenomics

56.5/100

Deflationary Mechanism?Historically, there have been token buyback events that contribute to deflation.Weight 30%There is a buyback mechanism · 70 / 100

Inflation rate?There are regular token unlocks, which boost circulation.Weight 25%There are periodic unlocks · 40 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of public staking or lock-up data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%10 billion (fixed) · 90 / 100

Team Governance

52/100

Core Development Team?Core team members are open and have a good background.Weight 30%Team is open and transparent · 75 / 100

Governance mechanisms?There is a lack of clear information on decentralized governance mechanisms.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Financial Transparency?Total financing amount and investor information are open and transparent.Weight 25%Financing information is disclosed · 80 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contract ownership is concentrated, with a high proportion of the top ten token-holding addresses.Weight 20%Highly concentrated · 10 / 100

Market Ecosystem

67/100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is excellent, and the community is active.Weight 30%High activity · 95 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The token is deployed across multiple mainstream blockchain ecosystems.Weight 25%Multi-chain deployment (5+) · 90 / 100

DeFi TVL?Non-DeFi protocols lack direct TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Security & Compliance

48/100

Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%&None · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance information leads to low compliance scores.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?There is a lack of clear SEC compliance information, creating uncertainty.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

04

D+ Peer Comparison

Export CSV
SignD+ · 37.64wojakD+ · 39.93Polyhedra NetworkD+ · 39.91yesnoerrorD+ · 39.9
Overall Score37.6439.9339.9139.9
Roadmap Delivery0037.511.25
Technical Implementation--------
Tokenomics023.5841.250
Team Governance303075.1634.4
Market Ecosystem76.957070.7271.33
Security & Compliance53.2150.54058.05

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions