Spacecoin SPACE

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No clear pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Inheriting Ethereum's mature PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has short runtime and limited historical data.Weight 15%About 0.3 years · 20 / 100

Recent upgrades?As an ERC-20 token, it relies on Ethereum upgrades.Weight 35%Depends on Ethereum · 70 / 100

Client Diversity?Inheriting the good diversity of clients in the Ethereum ecosystem.Weight 20%Good (depends on Ethereum) · 85 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflationary mechanism has been found.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Contracts can be minted and a large number of tokens are unlocked.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 5 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The proportion of staking or staking is extremely low.Weight 25%About 0% · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Although there is a maximum supply, contracts can be issued additionally.Weight 20%There is a risk of additional issuance · 10 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team has limited members and average backgrounds.Weight 30%Small team size · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The project is highly centralized, and the governance mechanism is not transparent.Weight 25%Highly centralized · 5 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of data on fund usage and transparency in proposal voting.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Concentration of key people?Token holding and contract permissions are highly centralized.Weight 20%Extremely high · 0 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses performed well.Weight 30%High activity · 95 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed across multiple mainstream ecosystems.Weight 25%3+ chains · 80 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for projects themselves.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community active data.Weight 20%Low activity · 5 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract carries the risk of unauthorized permission leakage.Weight 25%There is permission leakage · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory information, yet the project is highly centralized.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 20 / 100

Sec Attitude?Highly centralized and additional issuance rights may lead to securities disputes.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 15 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on the frequency of bugs on the project's own client.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100