Spark SPK

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public roadmaps and milestone data, making it impossible to assess.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?No recent public protocol upgrades, and GitHub activity is missing.Weight 30%No obvious protocol upgrades · 20 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public pending delivery milestone information makes assessment impossible.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of historical delay records makes effective assessment impossible.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Relying on Ethereum's mature PoS consensus mechanism, it offers high security.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating some operational experience.Weight 15%About 3 years · 70 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of publicly available up-to-date upgrade information and codebase activities.Weight 35%Insufficient data / lack of updates · 10 / 100

Client Diversity?As a protocol on Ethereum, its client diversity depends on Ethereum.Weight 20%Depends on the underlying chain · 60 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Although there are buyback proposals, tokens can be issued additionally, which is a deflationary mechanism flaw.Weight 30%There is a buyback proposal, but additional issuance is possible · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Token contracts have permission to issue additional tokens, with no upper limit on the inflation rate.Weight 25%It can be issued additionally and carries a high inflation risk · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Token staking or lock data is unclear, resulting in low lock-up ratios.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 5 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a nominal upper limit, but contracts can be issued additional issues; in practice, there is no strict upper limit.Weight 20%There is a nominal limit, but additional issuance is allowed · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?Lack of publicly available active development team information and code contributions.Weight 30%Low activity and insufficient data · 15 / 100

Governance mechanisms?There are governance proposals and voting activities, indicating community governance.Weight 25%There is a governance mechanism · 60 / 100

Financial Transparency?There is a lack of public information on financial transparency, making it impossible to assess the situation.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Concentration of key people?Token issuance rights are concentrated, posing serious centralization risks.Weight 20%There is a risk of centralized issuance · 0 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is excellent, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%High activity · 95 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Currently, it is mainly deployed on Ethereum, with limited cross-chain ecosystem expansion.Weight 25%1 (Ethereum) · 50 / 100

DeFi TVL?The total value locked in DeFi is high, reflecting the protocol's status within the ecosystem.Weight 25%$7.84 billion (high) · 90 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public developer community activities and code contributions.Weight 20%Low activity · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There is permission for token issuance, which poses extremely high potential security risks.Weight 25%There is permission to issue additional rights, which carries high potential risks · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Tokens can be issued in additional quantities, but regulatory attitudes may be unfriendly.Weight 30%Insufficient data / biased caution · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Tokens can be issued additionally, but the SEC's stance may be unfriendly.Weight 30%Insufficient data / biased caution · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data and the authority to issue additional data are core risks.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100