StablR Euro EURR

Ethereum EcosystemStablecoinsEUR StablecoinMiCA-Compliant Stablecoin

StablR Euro leads in market ecosystem and team governance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding an E+ rating.

Rating updated 2026-08-03
E+19.88 / 100

Sector Rank #911 · Global Rank #1694

Roadmap Delivery0F
Technical Implementation----
Tokenomics0F
Team Governance30F
Market Ecosystem67.97D+
Security & Compliance0F
01

Overall Rating

E+ · 19.88 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
30
Market Ecosystem
67.97
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
19.88

StablR Euro overall rating E+ (total score 19.88), ranking high in six dimensions for market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).

Rating Team Conclusion: "StablR Euro has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery, with current weaknesses focused on roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

0/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and delivery records.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of public upgrade information and delivery records.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Technical Implementation

53/100

Consensus Mechanism?As an ERC-20 token on Ethereum, it inherits its PoS mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The main network operation time of the project is relatively short and still requires time to verify.Weight 15%About 1.3 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of public upgrade information and codebase activities.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?Inheriting the client-side diversity advantages of the Ethereum mainnet.Weight 20%Good (Inherited Ethereum) · 85 / 100

Tokenomics

24.5/100

Deflationary Mechanism?As a stablecoin, its main goal is peging, not deflation.Weight 30%No obvious deflationary mechanism · 20 / 100

Inflation rate?Stablecoin mechanism, minting and burning on demand to maintain peg.Weight 25%Minting/destroying as needed · 50 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The project does not provide staking or lock-up mechanisms.Weight 25%No staking/lock-up · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?The supply of stablecoins is dynamically adjusted according to market demand.Weight 20%No fixed upper limit · 30 / 100

Team Governance

31/100

Core Development Team?Team background and VC endorsements are average, with a lack of public development activity.Weight 30%Average background, low development activity · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The project is a centralized stablecoin and lacks decentralized governance.Weight 25%Centralized Governance · 10 / 100

Financial Transparency?Proof of reserves is provided, but overall information on fund transparency is limited.Weight 25%Reserve funds are highly transparent · 70 / 100

Concentration of key people?Agency contracts exist, which may lead to centralized access to key individuals.Weight 20%High (agency contract available) · 10 / 100

Market Ecosystem

39.99/100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is excellent, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%High · 99.95 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Mainly deployed on Ethereum, with limited cross-chain ecosystem expansion.Weight 25%Mainly on Ethereum · 10 / 100

DeFi TVL?As a stablecoin, its DeFi value locked is relatively low.Weight 25%About $760,000 · 30 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public developer community activities and code contributions.Weight 20%Inactive · 0 / 100

Security & Compliance

53/100

Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%No public record · 80 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Complies with the EU MiCA regulatory framework, with a friendly regulatory attitude.Weight 30%Friendly under the MiCA framework · 90 / 100

Sec Attitude?There are risks associated with agency contracts, which may raise regulatory concerns.Weight 30%Disputes exist (agency contract risks) · 20 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug reports and fix records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

04

E+ Peer Comparison

Export CSV
StablR EuroE+ · 19.88Main Street USDE+ · 19.99SubQuery NetworkE+ · 19.98GoGoPoolE+ · 19.98
Overall Score19.8819.9919.9819.98
Roadmap Delivery037.53037.5
Technical Implementation--------
Tokenomics001.5628
Team Governance303052.868.32
Market Ecosystem67.9745.9536.531.02
Security & Compliance0000

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions