Stafi FIS
Stafi leads with its market ecosystem and team governance, with security and compliance remaining the main focus, currently holding a solid D- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D-23.74 / 100
Sector Rank #737 · Global Rank #1436
Overall Rating
D- · 23.74 / 100Roadmap Delivery
30
Tokenomics
3.06
Team Governance
46.8
Market Ecosystem
54.57
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
23.74
Stafi has an overall rating D-f D (total 23.34), ranking high in six dimensions for market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Stafi has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and roadmap delivery, but its current weaknesses are focused on security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
38.25/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public milestone data makes it impossible to assess delivery efficiency.Weight 35%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of public upgrade records, making it impossible to assess recent deliveries.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Technical Implementation
66.5/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on the mature Polkadot NPoS mechanism, it offers high security.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been operating since March 2021 and has a long history.Weight 15%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed information about recent upgrades and quality assessment data.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversity.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
3/100Deflationary Mechanism?Without clear token burn or deflationary mechanisms, value capture is zero.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?It lacks a public inflation rate, but value capture is zero, and its tokenomics model is weak.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?FIS tokens have very low value stake-up rates, and liquid staking is mainly targeted at other assets.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Total supply has been fully diluted, with a clear cap, but the overall economic model is weak.Weight 20%15 / 100 · 15 / 100
Team Governance
48/100Core Development Team?Core team members are visible, but their backgrounds and development activity are average.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanism transparency is moderate, and safety scores and governance intensity scores are moderate.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Financial Transparency?Medium transparency of funds, with publicly available financing information.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten non-treasury addresses hold extremely high coins, posing a risk of centralization.Weight 20%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Market Ecosystem
46.75/100Active Address?The number of active addresses is average, and ecosystem activity needs improvement.Weight 30%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream chains and has strong cross-chain integration capabilities.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
DeFi TVL?DeFi has relatively low total value locked and limited market influence.Weight 25%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Developer community?The GitHub repository is missing, and developer community activity is extremely low.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?There is a risk of red-line disclosure of permissions for token issuance, with a security rating of zero.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There are safety red lines, and regulatory risks are high.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?There are safety red lines, and the SEC's stance may be unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?There are safety red lines, and the client faces high potential risks.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| StafiD- · 23.74 |  RogueD- · 26.66 |  GaiAID- · 26.65 |  Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 23.74 | 26.66 | 26.65 | 26.64 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 30 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 3.06 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 46.8 | 30 | 56 | 70.72 |
| Market Ecosystem | 54.57 | 9.63 | 59.98 | 51.84 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.