tokenbot CLANKER

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data makes it difficult to assess.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, there have been multiple events in ecosystem integration and economic model optimization.Weight 30%Good (multiple important upgrades) · 75 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As an Ethereum L2, it inherits the security of the Ethereum PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Inherited from Ethereum) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but has already passed the initial stage.Weight 15%About 1.6 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?The recent upgrades involve ecosystem integration and core mechanism optimization, which have had a positive impact.Weight 35%Good (ecosystem integration and mechanism optimization) · 75 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?The project team has initiated token buyback and deflation mechanisms to support token value.Weight 30%Existence (Repurchase and Deflation) · 80 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a buyback mechanism, and the current circulating supply is close to the total supply cap.Weight 25%Deflation is trending · 85 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of clear token staking or locking mechanisms, or missing related data.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 20 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to long-term value stability.Weight 20%1,000,000 · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team has limited information disclosure and a relatively low development background score.Weight 30%Limited team information · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms exist, but transparency and decentralization still have room to be improved.Weight 25%Normal · 65 / 100

Financial Transparency?Funding transparency is acceptable, but there is still room for improvement.Weight 25%Normal · 65 / 100

Concentration of key people?The top ten non-treasury addresses hold relatively high coins, posing concentration risks.Weight 20%Slightly high · 30 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is moderate, with room for improvement.Weight 30%Moderately active · 53 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The ecosystem is mainly concentrated on a single chain, with limited cross-chain interoperability.Weight 25%1 (Base) · 40 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for projects themselves, making assessment difficult.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public developer activity data and low community activity.Weight 20%Inactive · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?No major safety incident records so far, safety score: Safety score is good.Weight 25%&None · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory attitude information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Sec Attitude?Lack of clear SEC stance information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100