TrueFi TRU

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available milestone delivery data makes assessment difficult.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?GitHub activity is sparse and there is no recent update record.Weight 30%No recent upgrades · 10 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public historical delay records, making it impossible to make an accurate judgment.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Relies on Ethereum's PoS mechanism, offering high security.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating operational experience.Weight 15%About 5.5 years · 85 / 100

Recent upgrades?GitHub activity is sparse and lacks recent major upgrades.Weight 35%No major recent upgrades · 10 / 100

Client Diversity?Relying on the Ethereum ecosystem, it has good client diversity.Weight 20%Good (depends on Ethereum) · 80 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%No explicit deflation mechanism · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?The supply has been fully circulated, with no additional inflationary pressure.Weight 25%Fixed supply, no inflation · 80 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of data on token staking or staking means TVL is relatively low in market cap.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 20 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Supply is fixed, with no risk of additional issuance.Weight 20%1,257,020,975 TRU (fixed) · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are visible, but their background scores are average.Weight 30%The core team is visible, but the background is average · 60 / 100

Governance mechanisms?DAO governance using Snapshot is highly intensive.Weight 25%DAO Governance (Snapshot) · 89 / 100

Financial Transparency?Transparent funding sources, governance proposals, and fund usage are highly transparent.Weight 25%High · 89 / 100

Concentration of key people?There are agency contracts and single point ownership addresses, resulting in high concentration.Weight 20%High (risk of single point control) · 10 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is excellent, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%High · 100 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports Ethereum and Optimism, with decent ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%2 (Ethereum, Optimism) · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?The total value locked in the protocol is extremely low, making it less attractive in the market.Weight 25%$21,700 (relatively low) · 10 / 100

Developer community?GitHub activity is sparse, and the developer community is inactive.Weight 20%Inactive · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%No major public faults · 80 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There are risks of backdoor code and permission leaks, and regulatory attitudes are rather cautious.Weight 30%Biased prudence (compliance risk) · 10 / 100

Sec Attitude?DeFi protocols face SEC scrutiny, and the projects have security red lines.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 10 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100