United Stables U
United Stables leads in market ecosystem and roadmap delivery, with security and compliance remaining the main focus and currently holding a D- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D-25.86 / 100
Sector Rank #22 · Global Rank #1260
Overall Rating
D- · 25.86 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
0.29
Team Governance
30
Market Ecosystem
70.67
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
25.86
United Stables has an overall rating D-f D (total 25.86), ranking high in market ecosystem, roadmap delivery, and team governance across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "United Stables has relative advantages in market ecosystem, roadmap delivery, and team governance, but its current shortcomings are mainly in security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
37/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap delivery data makes accurate assessment impossible.Weight 35%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery data makes accurate assessment impossible.Weight 30%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?No clear pending delivery milestones have been found, suggesting the project may be in maintenance phases.Weight 20%45 / 100 · 45 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records, making accurate assessment impossible.Weight 15%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Technical Implementation
34/100Consensus Mechanism?The PoSA mechanism balances decentralization and efficiency and has been stably operating on BSC.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime, and historical data and stability still need further verification.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of publicly available recent upgrade information and quality assessment data.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Diversity?BSC ecosystem clients have limited diversity and carry risks of centralization.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Tokenomics
0/100Deflationary Mechanism?As stablecoins, their design goal is price stability, not deflation.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?Value capture and demand logic are extremely weak, and stablecoin mechanisms have serious flaws.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?As stablecoins, they usually do not have staking or lock-up mechanisms.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Elastic supply may exacerbate risks when value capture and demand logic are weak.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Team Governance
30.5/100Core Development Team?The core team is relatively small in scale, lacking endorsement from well-known VCs and a background in serial entrepreneurship.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The project is a centralized stablecoin, with opaque governance mechanisms and a lack of community participation.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Financial Transparency?Secured $16 million in financing, but lack transparency information on the use of the funds.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Concentration of key people?The team is small in size and faces risks of agency contract and permission leaks, resulting in high concentration.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Market Ecosystem
71.5/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is excellent, showing high user engagement.Weight 30%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Deployed on Ethereum and BNB Smart Chain, with cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?As a stablecoin in the BSC ecosystem, it benefits from BSC's massive DeFi TVL.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Developer community?Lack of public developer community activities and third-party integration data.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?There are risks of agency contract and permission leakage, posing significant security risks.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There are backdoor code and permission leaks, and regulators may be unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?There are backdoor code and permission leaks, which the SEC may consider high-risk assets.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client codebase and bug frequency data.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| United StablesD- · 25.86 |  RogueD- · 26.66 |  GaiAID- · 26.65 |  Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 25.86 | 26.66 | 26.65 | 26.64 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0.29 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 30 | 56 | 70.72 |
| Market Ecosystem | 70.67 | 9.63 | 59.98 | 51.84 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.