USAT USAT

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?A lack of public roadmaps and milestones makes it impossible to assess delivery rates.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?No recent public upgrade records have been found.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestone information was found.Weight 20%&None · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?The lack of a public historical roadmap makes it impossible to assess the delay record.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As an ERC-20 token, its security relies on Ethereum PoS.Weight 30%Relying on Ethereum PoS · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The main network of the project has been running for a short time, and its stability remains to be seen.Weight 15%About 4 months · 10 / 100

Recent upgrades?As an agency contract, upgrades are controlled by the centralized party and have no independent upgrades.Weight 35%Agency contract, no independent upgrades · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?As an ERC-20 token, client diversity depends on the Ethereum ecosystem.Weight 20%Depends on Ethereum clients · 85 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflation mechanism design was found.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Minting capacity is unknown, and there is a potential inflation risk.Weight 25%Not disclosed (minting capability unknown) · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No staking or lock-up mechanisms were found, with a lock-up ratio of 0.Weight 25%0% · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Minting capacity is unknown, and supply caps remain uncertain.Weight 20%Uncertainty exists · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?Insufficient information disclosure for core teams, limited background assessments.Weight 30%Information is not transparent · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The project operates centrally, with no open governance mechanisms found.Weight 25%Centralized (No Public Mechanism) · 0 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of public information on fund usage and transparency.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Concentration of key people?Agent contracts contain backdoor code, with key permissions highly concentrated.Weight 20%High (Agency Contract Control) · 0 / 100

Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well, showing high user engagement.Weight 30%Good (86.35 / 100) · 86.35 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Zero third-party integrations, and low cross-chain liquidity scores.Weight 25%Underrepresented (Low Integration) · 10 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is not a DeFi protocol and lacks independent TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data (non-DeFi protocols) · 0 / 100

Developer community?No public developer community or codebase activity has been found.Weight 20%Missing · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract carries risks of backdoor code and permission leakage, posing significant hidden dangers.Weight 25%There is a risk of backdoor code · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Project compliance scores are extremely low, and regulatory attitudes tend to be cautious.Weight 30%Biased prudence (poor compliance) · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?As tokenized Treasury bills, there is a risk of being regarded as securities by the SEC.Weight 30%Dispute (may be considered a security) · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There are backdoor code and permission leaks, and contract security is questionable.Weight 15%There is a risk of contract vulnerabilities · 0 / 100