Vulcan Forged PYR

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on Polygon PoS, the consensus mechanism is mature and stable.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The main network of the project has been running for a long time, accumulating experience.Weight 15%About 4.5 years · 75 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of data on the quality and impact of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public information on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear token deflation mechanism.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?The token has a fixed supply cap and a low inflation rate.Weight 25%Lower (Fixed Upper Limit) · 80 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?TVL is extremely low relative to market capitalization, and the pledge rate is not high.Weight 25%Slightly low (about 0.3%) · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply cap, which helps stabilize value.Weight 20%50,000,000 PYR (fixed) · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?The core development team under-disclosed information and scored low in background.Weight 30%Limited information about the core team · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Security scores have high governance intensity but low degree of project decentralization.Weight 25%Centralized and biased · 40 / 100

Financial Transparency?High scores for fund transparency, with publicly available financing information.Weight 25%Good · 80 / 100

Concentration of key people?The contract has additional issuance rights, with key figures having concentrated power.Weight 20%High (can be issued additionally) · 10 / 100

Active Address?Daily active addresses perform well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%Good · 100 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports two mainstream chains, with decent ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%2 (Ethereum, Polygon) · 60 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi's total locked value is extremely low, and ecosystem participation is insufficient.Weight 25%About $32,700 (relatively low) · 5 / 100

Developer community?Lack of developer community activity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There have been major hacking incidents and poor security records.Weight 25%Existence (2021 Hacking) · 10 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of specific regulatory information regarding the project.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Sec Attitude?There is a lack of specific information about the SEC's stance on the project.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100