World Liberty Financial WLFI

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and actual delivery data leads to low development continuity.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 10 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, there have been numerous product announcements, collaborations, and exchange listings.Weight 30%There are many announcements and collaborations · 70 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?The project is deployed on a mature PoS chain, inheriting its consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime and is still in its early stages.Weight 15%About 0.75 years · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of core codebase and upgrade quality data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of data on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There have been records of destruction, but the impact on overall inflation has been limited.Weight 30%There is a destruction mechanism · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?The circulating supply is far below the total supply, creating significant inflationary pressure.Weight 25%Potential high inflation · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of clear data on staking or locking, with large players holding concentrated positions.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply cap, but the total is huge and value capture is weak.Weight 20%100 billion · 33.3 / 100

Core Development Team?Team members come from diverse backgrounds, but their core development experience data is insufficient.Weight 30%The team comes from diverse backgrounds · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?There is an active community voting and proposal mechanism.Weight 25%Community governance is active · 86.5 / 100

Financial Transparency?Fund information is disclosed, and treasury transparency is relatively high.Weight 25%High transparency of funds · 86.5 / 100

Concentration of key people?Agency contracts exist, which may lead to centralized access to key individuals.Weight 20%There is a risk of agency contracts · 5 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is low, indicating insufficient market activity.Weight 30%to be on the low side · 20 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains and has cross-chain potential.Weight 25%3 · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for projects themselves, resulting in low third-party integration.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Developer community?Lack of a public codebase, and zero developer activity trends.Weight 20%Low activity · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Historical records show stablecoin depegging and token freeze events.Weight 25%There are deanchoring and freezing events · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Political ties may lead to strict scrutiny from regulators.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The political background and U.S. ties may trigger SEC securities identification disputes.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public codebase and client-side bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100