0G 0G

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps, delivery plans, and actual completion data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent upgrade delivery details and completion status.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No clear pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical project delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As an L1 project, it is speculated to adopt a PoS consensus mechanism, with specific details yet to be disclosed.Weight 30%PoS (estimated) · 60 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet will launch in September 2025, with a relatively short runtime.Weight 15%About 0.7 years · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed information and quality assessments regarding the latest upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear information on deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%None (Data insufficient) · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a lack of public data on token inflation rates.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of public data on staking rates or staking rates.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply, which helps stabilize its value.Weight 20%1 billion · 100 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team member information is public, but development activity data is insufficient.Weight 30%Team members are public · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?There is a lack of detailed information about the project governance mechanism.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Financial Transparency?Total financing and investors are public, but data on transparency in fund usage is lacking.Weight 25%Financing information is disclosed, but transparency in fund usage is insufficient · 40 / 100

Concentration of key people?Token concentration is extremely high, with the top 10 addresses holding the vast majority of tokens.Weight 20%Extremely High (Top 10 Token-Holding Addresses Account for 94.7%) · 0 / 100

Active Address?Active address data shows some performance, but the exact number has not been disclosed.Weight 30%Insufficient data (L3 score 70.69) · 70.7 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on two main chains, but ecosystem expansion remains limited.Weight 25%2 · 40 / 100

DeFi TVL?Projects that are not DeFi-type or lack DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data (non-DeFi projects) · 0 / 100

Developer community?There are GitHub repositories and community channels, but developer activity data is missing.Weight 20%There is a community, but development activity data is insufficient · 30 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The project was previously hacked, causing some asset losses.Weight 25%Previously suffered a hacker attack (lost $520,000) · 20 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory compliance information, and the market regulatory environment is rather cautious.Weight 30%Insufficient data (partial caution) · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?Lack of clear SEC stance and disputes over project attributes.Weight 30%Controversy (Non-securities presumption) · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100