ZKsync ZK
Thanks to its strong team governance and market ecosystem performance, ZKsync remains a key focus on roadmap delivery, currently holding a D rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D28.31 / 100
Sector Rank #204 · Global Rank #1077
Overall Rating
D · 28.31 / 100Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
46.67
Team Governance
64.29
Market Ecosystem
45.29
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
28.31
ZKsync overall rating D (total 32.09), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "ZKsync has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic modeling, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of publicly available detailed roadmaps and delivery timeline data.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of detailed delivery information for the last four upgrades.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of clear information on pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical project delays.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
52/100Consensus Mechanism?zkRollup technology offers high security and inherits the security of the Ethereum mainnet.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a relatively short time but has been running stably.Weight 15%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed quality assessment data from recent upgrades.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversity.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Tokenomics
44/100Deflationary Mechanism?After the proposal is approved, network revenue will be used for token buybacks and burns.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Inflation rate?Lack of clear token inflation rate data.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of publicly available data on staking rates or hedging rates.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply, which helps stabilize its long-term value.Weight 20%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Team Governance
72.5/100Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and are supported by well-known investment institutions.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The safety score was rated as moderate in governance intensity.Weight 25%68 / 100 · 68 / 100
Financial Transparency?Multiple rounds of financing information have been disclosed, with transparent funding sources.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Concentration of key people?Lack of data on the concentration of key figures in project influence.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Market Ecosystem
34.76/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is good, and the ecosystem has a certain user base.Weight 30%74 / 100 · 74.2 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Lack of clear data on the number of ecosystem or L2 projects.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
DeFi TVL?DeFi TVL is relatively low, and the ecosystem needs to expand.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Developer community?Lack of quantitative data from an active developer community.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
39/100Historical Major Failure?Security incidents occurred, but all stolen funds have been recovered.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?The regulatory environment is complex, and attitudes toward L2 projects are uncertain.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC's regulatory stance on crypto assets remains unclear.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV| ZKsyncD · 28.31 |  VOOID · 33.28 |  ColonyD · 33.27 |  IMOD · 33.25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 28.31 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 46.67 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 64.29 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 45.29 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.