Aave AAVE

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public milestone plans and actual delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 10 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, V3 deployment and GHO have gone live, with V4 planned.Weight 30%V3 deployment, GHO launch, V4 planned · 70 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of clear near-term delivery milestones.Weight 20%V4 release plan, ETHLend relaunched · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Protocol security depends on the consensus mechanism of the underlying public chain.Weight 30%Dependency on the underlying chain (PoS/PoA) · 50 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has run for a long time, accumulating rich operational experience.Weight 15%About 6.5 years · 90 / 100

Recent upgrades?Although there are major upgrades like V3 and GHO, the code update quality scores are relatively low.Weight 35%V3 deployment, GHO launched · 10 / 100

Client Diversity?As a DeFi protocol, it does not directly have client diversity.Weight 20%Not applicable (DeFi protocol) · 30 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?The perpetual buyback program exists, but the risk of additional issuance may offset its effectiveness.Weight 30%Permanent Buyback Program ($50 million per year) · 50 / 100

Inflation rate?The contract carries the risk of issuing additional tokens, which may lead to inflation.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of public data on staking or lock-up rates results in weak value capture capability.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a risk of additional issuance, and the supply ceiling may be breached.Weight 20%16 million (risk of additional issuance) · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are publicly disclosed, but their execution records score average.Weight 30%Core team members are publicly available and supported by VCs · 50 / 100

Governance mechanisms?It has a mature DAO governance mechanism and high community participation.Weight 25%DAO Governance (Snapshot) · 95 / 100

Financial Transparency?Financing information is public, but there is a lack of transparency data on treasury fund usage.Weight 25%Financing information is public, but transparency data on fund usage is insufficient · 60 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contracts have the authority to hide owners and modify balances, which is extremely risky.Weight 20%There is a hidden owner and centralized permissions · 0 / 100

Active Address?A high score for daily active addresses indicates good user engagement.Weight 30%High activity · 95 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The protocol has been deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains and L2s, with broad ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%14 chains / L2 · 100 / 100

DeFi TVL?As a leading DeFi protocol, it has a massive TVL scale and a solid market position.Weight 25%13.65 billion USD · 98 / 100

Developer community?GitHub activity is good, but recent update frequency is average.Weight 20%Activity level is above average · 80 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are hidden ownership and additional issuance rights, posing significant security risks.Weight 25%There are potential major safety hazards · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Although the SEC investigation has concluded, core contract authority issues remain a regulatory concern.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Although the SEC investigation has concluded, core contract authority issues remain a potential securities risk.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?The core contract had permission breaches, resulting in an overall security rating of 0.Weight 15%Not applicable (DeFi protocol) · 0 / 100