Bless BLESS
Bless leads in market ecosystem and roadmap delivery, with security and compliance remaining the main focus and currently holding a D- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D-25.13 / 100
Sector Rank #149 · Global Rank #1316
Overall Rating
D- · 25.13 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
2.82
Team Governance
30
Market Ecosystem
65.42
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
25.13
Bless overall rating D- (total score 25.13), ranking high in market ecosystem, roadmap delivery, and team governance across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Bless has relative advantages in market ecosystem, roadmap delivery, and team governance, but its current shortcomings are focused on security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
37.5/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public, detailed roadmaps and delivery data.Weight 35%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent record of protocol upgrades.Weight 30%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Missing information on milestones to be disclosed for delivery.Weight 20%35 / 100 · 35 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of assessmentable historical delay data.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Technical Implementation
38/100Consensus Mechanism?Relying on the consensus mechanism of mature underlying chains, with no independent consensus of its own.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet or token has been up for a short time and has insufficient operational history.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed information about the recent protocol upgrade.Weight 35%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Client Diversity?As an application layer protocol, the concept of client diversity is not fully applicable.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Tokenomics
20/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear information on deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?Lack of clear token inflation rate data.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of token staking or locking data, or extremely low proportions.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%100 / 100 · 100 / 100
Team Governance
16.5/100Core Development Team?The background information of core team members is public, but there is a lack of standout highlights.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Project governance mechanisms are centralized, lacking decentralized governance.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Financial Transparency?Lack of information on fund usage and treasury transparency.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Concentration of key people?Contracts contain backdoor code, with a high concentration of critical permissions.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Market Ecosystem
50.53/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses performed well.Weight 30%85 / 100 · 85.1 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream blockchains.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project is not DeFi-related, and TVL data is either unsuitable or missing.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Developer community?Developer activity is extremely low, and community activity is insufficient.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?The contract contains backdoor code, posing a significant security risk.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Compliance is extremely low, and there are serious regulatory risks.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?There are backdoor codes and permission leaks, and the SEC has taken an unfriendly stance.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency, but overall security risks are high.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
D- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| BlessD- · 25.13 |  RogueD- · 26.66 |  GaiAID- · 26.65 |  Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 25.13 | 26.66 | 26.65 | 26.64 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 2.82 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 30 | 56 | 70.72 |
| Market Ecosystem | 65.42 | 9.63 | 59.98 | 51.84 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.