Internet Computer ICP

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Project development is highly active and sustainable.Weight 35%Good · 85 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, code submissions have been active, and development is ongoing.Weight 30%Good · 90 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There is insufficient public milestone data, but development is active.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 80 / 100

History Extension Record?The project development is highly sustainable, with no major delays.Weight 15%Somewhat less · 85 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Utilizes innovative Chain Key technology for superior performance.Weight 30%Chain Key (PoS variant) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been online since 2021 and has been running for a long time.Weight 15%About 5 years · 85 / 100

Recent upgrades?The code updates are of high quality, and development has been active recently.Weight 35%High quality · 95 / 100

Client Diversity?As a single L1, client diversity is relatively limited.Weight 20%to be on the low side · 60 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Weak value capture capability, and deflationary mechanisms are not obvious.Weight 30%Weak mechanisms · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?The token has permission to issue additional tokens, but it carries high inflation risk.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 5 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of publicly available data on staking rates or hedging rates.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Tokens have permission to issue additional tokens and are not subject to a strict supply cap.Weight 20%Soft upper limit/additional issuance present · 10 / 100

Core Development Team?Led by well-known foundations, with a strong team background.Weight 30%DFINITY Foundation · 80 / 100

Governance mechanisms?On-chain NNS governance is used, offering high transparency.Weight 25%NNS (On-chain Governance) · 85 / 100

Financial Transparency?Received investment from well-known institutions, and disclosed fund information.Weight 25%High · 80 / 100

Concentration of key people?Core team members have low execution scores.Weight 20%Normal · 60 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is relatively low and needs improvement.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 45 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As an independent L1, it has relatively low third-party integration.Weight 25%Single L1 · 30 / 100

DeFi TVL?The DeFi ecosystem is relatively small, and TVL data is not prominent.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 20 / 100

Developer community?GitHub is highly active, and the developer community is of a certain scale.Weight 20%Active · 70 / 100

Historical Major Failure?No major safety fault records were found in the publicly available information.Weight 25%No public record · 80 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?flagged as potential securities, facing regulatory uncertainty.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Flagged as potential securities, the SEC has taken an unfriendly stance.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Code security scores are high, and bugs are expected to be less frequent.Weight 15%to be on the low side · 85 / 100