
JasmyCoin JASMY
JasmyCoin leads in security, compliance, and team governance, with its economic model remaining a key focus, currently holding a solid C- rating.
Sector Rank #164 · Global Rank #449
Overall Rating
C- · 41.31 / 100JasmyCoin has an overall rating C-f C (total 42.53), ranking highly in six dimensions for security compliance, team governance, and roadmap delivery. The main deduction points are in the economic model (17.82 points)—mainly influenced by short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points) and value capture (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "JasmyCoin has relative advantages in security compliance, team governance, and roadmap delivery, but its current weaknesses are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
36.9/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public, detailed roadmaps and delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 35 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of publicly available information on recent upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 38 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 40 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 35 / 100
Technical Implementation
73.75/100Consensus Mechanism?As an Ethereum ecosystem token, it benefits from the Ethereum PoS mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The token has been online since early 2021 and has been running for a long time.Weight 15%About 5 years · 75 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of public information on the quality and impact of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?As an Ethereum token, it benefits from the diversity of Ethereum clients.Weight 20%High (benefiting from Ethereum) · 90 / 100
Tokenomics
14.25/100Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%&None · 5 / 100
Inflation rate?Supply is near the upper limit, but market demand is insufficient.Weight 25%Very Low (Almost Fully Available) · 30 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, and the market circulation is large.Weight 25%Very Low · 5 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear fixed supply cap, but the total volume is huge.Weight 20%50 billion (fixed) · 20 / 100
Team Governance
53/100Core Development Team?The core team has limited information, and GitHub development activity is extremely low.Weight 30%Small scale, low development activity · 10 / 100
Governance mechanisms?High governance intensity scores in safety scores indicate a sound governance mechanism.Weight 25%Good (Safety Score, High Score) · 92 / 100
Financial Transparency?High scores for financial transparency, and financial management is transparent.Weight 25%High · 92 / 100
Concentration of key people?Limited team size information and risk of key personnel concentration.Weight 20%medium-high · 20 / 100
Market Ecosystem
32/100Active Address?The number of active addresses is moderate, and ecosystem participation is average.Weight 30%Normal · 50 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Mainly deployed on Ethereum, with low cross-chain and L2 integration.Weight 25%Single (Ethereum) · 10 / 100
DeFi TVL?Non-core DeFi assets, lacking direct DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data (non-DeFi core assets) · 50 / 100
Developer community?GitHub development activity is extremely low, and the developer community is inactive.Weight 20%Inactive · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
60.75/100Historical Major Failure?So far, no major public security incidents have been found.Weight 25%&None · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear compliance information and a cautious regulatory environment.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 40 / 100
Sec Attitude?As a token, its securities attributes are disputed in the United States.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 40 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lacking direct data but benefiting from Ethereum client stability.Weight 15%Insufficient data (benefiting from Ethereum) · 95 / 100
C- Peer Comparison
Export CSV JasmyCoinC- · 41.31 | DODOC- · 46.61 | BasenjiC- · 46.54 | OKZOOC- · 46.47 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 41.31 | 46.61 | 46.54 | 46.47 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 0 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 17.82 | 66.79 | 24.53 | 1.07 |
| Team Governance | 54.8 | 90.37 | 51.6 | 56.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 29.53 | 91.6 | 55.01 | 67.44 |
| Security & Compliance | 62.6 | 0 | 60.45 | 60.5 |



Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.