
MAGA Hat MAGA
MAGA Hat leads in market ecosystem and security compliance, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding a C- rating.
Sector Rank #165 · Global Rank #450
Overall Rating
C- · 41.3 / 100MAGA Hat overall rating C-f C (total 41.3), ranking highly in six dimensions for market ecosystem, security compliance, and roadmap delivery. The main deduction points are in the economic model (13.26 points) — mainly influenced by short- to medium- to short-term selling pressure (0 points) and value capture (0 points).
The rating team concluded: "MAGA Hat has relative advantages in market ecosystem, security compliance, and roadmap delivery, with current weaknesses focused on its economic model. " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public roadmaps and milestone data, making it impossible to assess them.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?The project lacks technical development and has no recent upgrade records.Weight 30%No substantial upgrades · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?The project did not publish clear milestones to be delivered.Weight 20%No public milestones · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?Due to the lack of a roadmap, it is impossible to assess the historical delays.Weight 15%No public record · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
53/100Consensus Mechanism?Based on Ethereum's PoS mechanism, it is highly secure and verified.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The main network operation time is relatively short, and stability needs long-term verification.Weight 15%About 2 years · 60 / 100
Recent upgrades?As a meme coin, the project lacks technical upgrades and iterations.Weight 35%No substantial upgrades · 0 / 100
Client Diversity?Relying on the Ethereum mainnet, its client diversity is strong.Weight 20%Good (depends on Ethereum) · 85 / 100
Tokenomics
35.5/100Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit deflationary mechanism has been found in the tokenomics model.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a supply cap, but a small number of uncirculated tokens remain.Weight 25%Lower (with supply cap) · 70 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No token staking or lock-up mechanisms were found, resulting in concentrated liquidity.Weight 25%Very Low · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to long-term value stability.Weight 20%420.69 trillion · 90 / 100
Team Governance
5/100Core Development Team?The core development team's information is not transparent and lacks public background.Weight 30%Anonymous/Opaque · 10 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The project lacks decentralized governance mechanisms and centralized decision-making.Weight 25%&None · 0 / 100
Financial Transparency?The sources and usage of funds are not transparent, lacking public disclosure.Weight 25%Opacity · 0 / 100
Concentration of key people?Token holdings are highly concentrated, posing potential manipulation risks.Weight 20%Highly concentrated · 10 / 100
Market Ecosystem
34.67/100Active Address?Daily active addresses perform well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%High activity · 98.9 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is only deployed on Ethereum, with limited ecosystem scalability.Weight 25%1 (Ethereum) · 20 / 100
DeFi TVL?As a meme coin, it lacks DeFi integration and TVL data.Weight 25%Very low / None · 0 / 100
Developer community?Lack of an active developer community and code contributions.Weight 20%Very little · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
50.5/100Historical Major Failure?There are currently no publicly available records of major security incidents, but risks remain.Weight 25%No public records are available · 70 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?MemeCoin generally faces regulatory cautiousness.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 40 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC may be controversial about the securities attributes of meme coins.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 30 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?As an ERC-20 token, it relies on Ethereum clients and has a low bug frequency.Weight 15%Extremely low (depends on Ethereum) · 80 / 100
C- Peer Comparison
Export CSV MAGA HatC- · 41.3 | DODOC- · 46.61 | BasenjiC- · 46.54 | OKZOOC- · 46.47 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 41.3 | 46.61 | 46.54 | 46.47 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 30 | 0 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 13.26 | 66.79 | 24.53 | 1.07 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 90.37 | 51.6 | 56.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 67.29 | 91.6 | 55.01 | 67.44 |
| Security & Compliance | 49.96 | 0 | 60.45 | 60.5 |



Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.