Million MM

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and delivery records.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?No recent major upgrade delivery records were found.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No clear pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical delay records, making it impossible to assess.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Mainly deployed on BNB Chain (PoSA) and Ethereum (PoS).Weight 30%Multi-chain (PoSA/PoS) · 80 / 100

Main network years of operation?The main network of the project has been online since July 2021 and has been running for a long time.Weight 15%About 4.9 years · 85 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed information and quality assessments regarding recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public information about client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Token contracts have an inscription function but no explicit deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%No clear deflationary mechanism, additional issuance is allowed · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?Contracts can issue additional contracts, but specific inflation rate data is missing.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance, and specific data is insufficient · 10 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The proportion of lock-up holders is 0, and there is no staking mechanism.Weight 25%Very Low (0%) · 5 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?The initial supply is 1 million, but the contract can be issued additionally.Weight 20%1 million (can be issued additionally) · 10 / 100

Core Development Team?Project data shows only one founder, lacking public information about the development team.Weight 30%The core team is small in scale, and only the founders are publicly disclosed · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Contracts have hidden owners, and governance authority is highly centralized.Weight 25%There is a risk of hidden ownership and centralized permissions · 10 / 100

Financial Transparency?Proposal voting is highly transparent, but there are no public funding rounds.Weight 25%Proposal voting is highly transparent but does not disclose financing information · 50 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contract owner authority is centralized, with hidden owners.Weight 20%Highly concentrated, with hidden owners · 10 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is extremely low, and the market is insufficiently active.Weight 30%Extremely Low (0.07) · 5 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The token is deployed on multiple mainstream public chains and has a certain degree of interoperability.Weight 25%Multi-chain deployment (ETH, BSC, Polygon, etc.) · 60 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for projects themselves.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Developer community?No publicly active developer communities or codebases have been found.Weight 20%No publicly active developer community · 5 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract has hidden owners and permission to issue additional items, triggering a security red line.Weight 25%There is a risk of privilege leakage · 5 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory attitude information, leading to prudent assessment.Weight 30%Insufficient data, leaning toward caution · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC lacks a clear stance on the project and adopts a prudent evaluation.Weight 30%Insufficient data, leaning toward caution · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 20 / 100